Accuracy Vs. ease/speed
-
just reading a topic in the newbie forums got me thinking, if you have a component to model, where accuracy isn't a particular requirement, would you go for a less accurate but faster method for modelling it, or try and make it as it is in real life?
personaly id probably go for faster, altohugh if there's a considerable difference in the end result id probably go for a more accurte model.
and sorry if this is in the wrong forum, move it if you want.
-
Hi folks.
If I just need to convey an idea, I wont bother with dimensions.
However, if modeling something real to check for feasabily for an installation or interference check for example, I will use exact values.
Just ideas.
-
I think you should always model for accuracy. I have found too many times I have had to go back and change things after the fact and if I would have modeled accurately in the first place there would have been no need to. Accuracy saves time and money in the end.
Scott
-
I agree with Scott. Plus in the future if you have to revisit the model or expand on it you will already have an accurate model to go with.
-
@unknownuser said:
I think you should always model for accuracy. I have found too many times I have had to go back and change things after the fact and if I would have modeled accurately in the first place there would have been no need to. Accuracy saves time and money in the end.
Scott
touché
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
Advertisement