3ds Max finish for SU model
-
Thanks Ivica, in fact, true, I am more interested in the modelling part (also by "profession") so I'm not "shy"
I also "play around" with rendering a bit, try out this and that but I will never become a 3D artist in this field (especially having seen some of you guys' renders here).
Enough for me is that when we work together, I can criticize (well, "comment" and "suggest") things and tell ways what should be done to change the model/render and that I know (more or less) whether it can be done or not. That's already a big help to the guy I'm working with for dealing with a total amateaur can really be a problem sometimes (I guess a lot of you know that feeling).
-
Gai, thanks for the site. The pictures are great and what a history!! It's a beautiful city
-
Ah, thanks, really... (I also worked for that site - I wrote most of the texts and the lame English translations...
) -
Just a little bit "improved" animation test - still with no textures...
[flash=480,384:xdkio4rb]http://www.gaieus.hu/su/videos/baziluj.swf[/flash:xdkio4rb]
-
Two more shots of the cathedral:
-
Gai, these are looking fantastic.
The first thing I noticed however
was the blue glass. This looks
somewhat un-natural.The second thing I noticed was
that there are no ridge caps on
the roof texture.Just observations.
-
Points taken, Eric - you are right in both things.
That's why I posted them; I've been looking / checking them for too long and my eyes just skip a lot of details for they're "used to them".Thanks for the suggestions (though this weekend a lot of the movies will be rendered - at least for a "first shot").
Here's just a short "example" ( just a "cut-out" or "part" of a whole movie):
[flash=640,480:1e5rp77f]http://www.gaieus.hu/su/videos/karmelit_proba.swf[/flash:1e5rp77f]
-
I would like to see that movie when finished, it seems very smooth and it is certainly an interesting building to view!
-
Sure, Dylan - I will post all of them here (I just need to compress them a little bit and convert to flash - so they may lose some quality).
-
Just another movie.
This is the Dominican monastery at the excavation fo which I already worked as a freshly graduated archaeologist in 1991.
Of course we did not find everything like this then...
(The file is a bit big - sorry for that -so it needs some download time. There is a better resolution wmv file here)[flash=480,384:2is289h9]http://www.gaieus.hu/su/videos/Dominican.swf[/flash:2is289h9]
Again, I need to express that the 3D Max rendering was done by a colleague, not me. I just made the model in SU.
-
Unreal dude. I expect to see this on the History channel soon
-
Unfortunately it has also lost a lot of its quality during compression and export to swf.
-
Im jealous, the USA sucks for these sorts of things as the oldest thing we got that is man made isnt more than a couple hundred years old. Good looking model.
(Masta Squidge)
-
Well, to tell the truth, when the Turks invaded my city in 1543, within a few decades they pulled down most of these churches and monasteries to replace them with mosques (but at least we have the northmost - and still working! - mosques from the Ottoman Empire now
)Well, here is the cathedral (some pics of which I have already posted):
[flash=480,384:2bdapbnf]http://www.gaieus.hu/su/videos/Cathedral.swf[/flash:2bdapbnf]
It is more or less intact though have been rebuilt twice since the Turkish rule ended at the end of the 17th century.
There is a better resolution wmv file here. -
Added some hi(er)-res wmv files to the video posts...
-
Well, another wmv file about the Carmelite Monastery can be found here.
Since it is a female order, they got some blossoming trees here (say almond or peach maybe) -
Gaieus,those are amazing, just curious though, were those modeled by eye and memory or did you use text books with pictures, frequent trips to the site, any kind of floor plans or measurements, or something else?
Mike
-
Well, Mike,
This is my profession: I am an archaeologist and historian. I even worked at some of the excavations of these churches when just finished university.
So mostly I have the site "plans" that we draw (exact measurements etc) and access to all the archives of the museum as well as the Chapters Archives, too.
Then I had access to the survey measurements of the city itself, too, so most of the locations are pretty accurate.
Since most of these buildings have gone by now, I had to reconstruct some window tracery from fragments (or at least make - some simplified but "resembling" variations since you cannot see them from here, can you) and also the vaultings of the churches (they are all modelled from inside, too).
Then we have some old drawings, pictures views of some buildings as well as the whole city...
So it was quite a nice, challenging and interesting job where of course I still had to use a lot of imagination to add details which has no traces any more.
It's about to finish now so I can get back to my "favourite" late Roman buildings that we excavated last year.
-
@gaieus said:
Points taken, Eric - you are right in both things.
That's why I posted them; I've been looking / checking them for too long and my eyes just skip a lot of details for they're "used to them".I would also like to see a cross on those monasteries* and churches. A small but important detail imo, otherwise excellent work.
- I live in such a place so I know.
(sgpm)
- I live in such a place so I know.
-
That is also true but in all three depictions of the town that exist from the "pre Turkish period" here (from before 1543 - after which the Turks, capturing the city for 143 years, demolished the churches) so there cannot be crosses seen.
For us nowadays it would be obvious to put a cross and we had quite long debates but then insisted on the depictions.
And now I cannot really tell the guy to re-render the films on his machine for they took about almost a week each!
Tahnks for this input though - I'm kind of regretting now that we did not put them there...
Advertisement