sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    [Code] layers.purge_unused

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Developers' Forum
    18 Posts 6 Posters 2.3k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Didier BurD Offline
      Didier Bur
      last edited by

      Hi,
      Just an πŸ’­ : as groups are stored like components, maybe that changing the layer of a group doesn't change it's internal definition ?
      Check for internal compos definitions and scan their entities to see if they are on their original layer. In such a case, SU doesn't allow to delete the layer.

      DB

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • thomthomT Offline
        thomthom
        last edited by

        Your code only modifies groups/components to be placed on layer 0. It assumes that all geometry is also placed on layer 0.

        Seeing how Tomasz reports it working for him I'm guessing there is some entity that's not located on layer 0. If you turn on Color By Layer (ensuring edges are coloured by material as well) - see if you see anything with a colour other than what layer 0 is set to.

        Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
        List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • thomthomT Offline
          thomthom
          last edited by

          @didier bur said:

          Hi,
          Just an πŸ’­ : as groups are stored like components, maybe that changing the layer of a group doesn't change it's internal definition ?
          Check for internal compos definitions and scan their entities to see if they are on their original layer. In such a case, SU doesn't allow to delete the layer.

          Ah yea! iterating over the top level entities won't do it. In addition all model.definitions has to be iterated. that's it!

          Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
          List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • thomthomT Offline
            thomthom
            last edited by

            In fact, since you only want to modify groups components you don't have to check the top level at all.

            Just scan the definition array for Group/Component definitions (ignoring Image definitions) and loop over the instances for each definition.

            Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
            List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • chrisglasierC Offline
              chrisglasier
              last edited by

              Thanks all ... some overnight sleuthing is required ...

              With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • thomthomT Offline
                thomthom
                last edited by

                I think this will work:

                
                model = Sketchup.active_model
                layers = model.layers
                
                model.definitions.each { |d|
                
                	# Ignore Images and definitions with no instances
                	next if d.image? || d.count_instances == 0
                	# Set Group/ComponentInstance to layer0
                	d.instances.each { |i| i.layer = layers[0] }
                
                }
                
                layers.purge_unused
                
                UI.show_inspector("Layers") 
                
                

                Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • chrisglasierC Offline
                  chrisglasier
                  last edited by

                  @thomthom said:

                  I think this will work: ...

                  Yes thanks it does reduce the layer count from 23 to 20, of which 12 are correctly retained for non real world replica dimensions and labels.

                  But I have to do more sleuthing ...

                  Chris

                  With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • chrisglasierC Offline
                    chrisglasier
                    last edited by

                    @chrisglasier said:

                    But I have to do more sleuthing ...

                    Here are the results so far:

                    I deleted all loose geometry

                    The total number of groups and components matches the javascript array indicating all have been passed to layer0 using Thomas' definition loop (thanks again for that).

                    Each entity and any children in the expanded outliner view returns layer0 in entity info.

                    But see this:

                    Layer.png

                    The selected column shows in its original layer colour and can be turned on and off with the original layer checkbox - yet the entity info shows layer0. And if I make the columns layer active and hide layer0, nothing is displayed or indicated in th outliner. The same is true for the remaining seemingly "unpurgable" layers.

                    What think?

                    Chris

                    With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • chrisglasierC Offline
                      chrisglasier
                      last edited by

                      I just noticed that there are 7 section planes -

                      Layer02.png

                      the same number as the unpurgable layers. I don't know much about these. Perhaps it is just coincidental?

                      Chris

                      With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • chrisglasierC Offline
                        chrisglasier
                        last edited by

                        @chrisglasier said:

                        I just noticed that there are 7 section planes - Perhaps it is just coincidental?

                        Yes it is - all section planes are on layer0 (obvious to me now).

                        Here is the current code:

                        
                        
                        @dlg.add_action_callback("sceneLayersPurge") {|d, p|
                        
                        model = Sketchup.active_model
                        layers = model.layers
                        entities = model.entities
                        
                        array = []
                        a = 0
                        
                        model.definitions.each { |d|
                        
                           # Ignore Images and definitions with no instances
                           next if d.image? || d.count_instances == 0
                           # Set Group/ComponentInstance to layer0
                           d.instances.each { |i| 
                        
                           
                         if i.class == Sketchup;;Group 
                        
                        name = i.name
                        
                        end
                        
                        if i.class == Sketchup;;ComponentInstance 
                        
                        name = i.definition.name
                        
                        end
                        
                        original = i.layer.name
                        
                        i.layer = layers[0] 
                        
                        array[a] = [name,original,i.layer.name]
                        array[a] = array[a].join(",")
                        a = a + 1   }  }
                        
                        
                        layers.purge_unused
                        
                        UI.show_inspector("Layers") 
                        
                        
                        array = array.join(";")
                        
                        
                        cmd = "sceneLayersPurgeReceive('#{array}');"
                        @dlg.execute_script (cmd)     }
                        
                        
                        

                        and here are samples from the js report showing name, original layer, final layer

                        Layers034.png

                        I'm running out of sleuthing ideas!

                        Chris

                        With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • daikuD Offline
                          daiku
                          last edited by

                          Have you tried manually making the problem layers invisible? If so, does anything disappear? Also, try manually deleting the layer. If it's truly empty, SU will quietly remove it. If it's not empty, SU will warn you, and ask where you want to move the things. CB.

                          Clark Bremer
                          http://www.northernlightstimberframing.com

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Chris FullmerC Offline
                            Chris Fullmer
                            last edited by

                            Can you supply the model you are working with? It might help figure it out faster.

                            Chris

                            Lately you've been tan, suspicious for the winter.
                            All my Plugins I've written

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • chrisglasierC Offline
                              chrisglasier
                              last edited by

                              Thanks all. I need to rethink this before asking people to venture further down a blind alley.

                              I can reduce a Sketchup up model to two plain text lists. One lists components and groups and the other lists scenes. Both lists are turned into javascript multi-level arrays.

                              But I don't want to wipe out any established relationships between components and layers, layers and scenes, scenes and styles and scenes and property settings. I thought I could do that by manipulating the model but I am thinking it is probably better to capture the data and regenerate the whole thing.

                              If you are interested in why I want to do this please see the discussion in the Modelur thread.

                              Thanks and regards

                              Chris

                              With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Buy SketchPlus
                              Buy SUbD
                              Buy WrapR
                              Buy eBook
                              Buy Modelur
                              Buy Vertex Tools
                              Buy SketchCuisine
                              Buy FormFonts

                              Advertisement