sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    βŒ› Sale Ending | 30% Off Profile Builder 4 ends 30th September

    Clean energy sources

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Corner Bar
    43 Posts 13 Posters 1.8k Views 13 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T Offline
      tomasz
      last edited by

      I thought it wouldn't be necessary to get help from a clown, but here we go.

      "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer

      Author of [Thea Render for SketchUp](http://www.thearender.com/sketchup)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • AnssiA Offline
        Anssi
        last edited by

        @unknownuser said:

        They may sound as a pure nonsense to someone who doesn't know what vortex effect is. There are industrial applications of this principle in air-conditioning/refrigerators industry:
        http://www.airtxinternational.com/catalog/vortex_tubes.php (Click on link about vortex tube)
        and a Wikipedia page describing the effect:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_tube

        The links describe vortex tubes that consume energy, not make it. Their inefficiency is the reason why they are used only in specialized applications.

        @unknownuser said:

        As you will notice there is no exact explanation of this effect. It means that the principles of the effect are not well examined.

        That Wikipedia is short on the subject means nothing. I understand that the principles of fluid dynamics are quite well known, but that the mathematics are not for the faint-hearted (like me)

        @unknownuser said:

        achieve a state of a negative friction.

        No such thing exists. The laws of thermodynamics must be obeyed, even by Irishmen

        Anssi

        securi adversus homines, securi adversus deos rem difficillimam adsecuti sunt, ut illis ne voto quidem opus esset

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D Offline
          Double Espresso
          last edited by

          @unknownuser said:

          I thought it wouldn't be necessary to get help from a clown, but here we go.

          "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer

          Lighten up...

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • FrederikF Offline
            Frederik
            last edited by

            This is very interesting...!

            I have absolutely no idea about whether this is pure nonsens or some unknown physic forces that we're yet to learn a lot about...?!? πŸ˜•

            I sure hope that some clever heads will be able to find a good alternative to oil and nuclear energy...
            http://www.kerkythea.net/users/Frederik/Anim-Icons/praise.gif

            @anssi said:

            No such thing exists. The laws of thermodynamics must be obeyed, even by Irishmen

            πŸ˜† Well... You can't know any better, Anssi, but Tomasz is from Poland, but is now living in Ireland... πŸ˜‰

            Cheers
            Kim Frederik

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T Offline
              tomasz
              last edited by

              I present those things as something to take obviously critically. I find them simply interesting. One day it may appear to all of us that 'the Earth is not flat and it is spinning around the Sun, not other way round'.

              Physics defends vigorously that the energy cannot be multiplied or destroyed.
              Something from Dragons Den - Richard Willis took part in this show as a kind of 'protection', to make his discovery and a face known to wider public.

              [flash=480,295:ir1vtbli]http://www.youtube.com/v/vvfi9ZpXKOY[/flash:ir1vtbli]

              And a quote from his webpage:

              @unknownuser said:

              Where the problem comes from is the fact that some of you have taken everything from a text book as law. The fact was in 1831 it was a rule made by a guy (Faraday) who like all of us was trying to understand how to make power.

              http://www.vorktex.ca/

              In all those already presented cases probably we don't deal with a 'creation' of energy. It can be simply pulled out from a yet unknown source.

              Author of [Thea Render for SketchUp](http://www.thearender.com/sketchup)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                tomasz
                last edited by

                @anssi said:

                The links describe vortex tubes that consume energy, not make it. Their inefficiency is the reason why they are used only in specialized applications.

                The creators of AATE claim they have harnessed an energy of implosion, instead of explosion.

                @anssi said:

                No such thing exists. The laws of thermodynamics must be obeyed, even by Irishmen

                Wouldn't be more true/wiser to write: "Such a thing is not known to the physics? According to it the negative friction does not exist."

                There are people that claim that an inner portion of a fluid/gas being compressed in a vortex is gliding on an outer, of higher temp. and not so dense, layer.

                I prefer keeping my mind open, instead of closing it in a closed loop of dogmas.

                @unknownuser said:

                energy. It can be simply pulled out from a yet unknown source.

                [flash=425,344:yhw2y8d1]http://www.youtube.com/v/XE5g6x6OOb0[/flash:yhw2y8d1]

                πŸ˜„

                Author of [Thea Render for SketchUp](http://www.thearender.com/sketchup)

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  remus
                  last edited by

                  The fact of the matter is their is a mountain of evidence which suggests energy cannot be created and very little evidence to the contrary, so until someone conclusively shows that energy can be created i find it hard to believe.

                  http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    PeterCharles
                    last edited by

                    @remus said:

                    so until someone conclusively shows that energy can be created i find it hard to believe.

                    I thought it had been shown that energy can be created from matter??

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R Offline
                      remus
                      last edited by

                      matter is energy, an important point to note.

                      http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • pbacotP Offline
                        pbacot
                        last edited by

                        Keep an open mind. But science is not dogma. I would say it is the opposite of dogma.

                        MacOSX MojaveSketchUp Pro v19 Twilight v2 Thea v3 PowerCADD

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D Offline
                          Double Espresso
                          last edited by

                          @pbacot said:

                          Keep an open mind. But science is not dogma. I would say it is the opposite of dogma.

                          catma?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Offline
                            PeterCharles
                            last edited by

                            @remus said:

                            matter is energy, an important point to note.

                            Some old bloke called Einstein wasn't it, and demonstrated by the Manhattan Project 😎

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R Offline
                              remus
                              last edited by

                              Thats the chap πŸ‘

                              http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T Offline
                                tomasz
                                last edited by

                                @remus said:

                                The fact of the matter is their is a mountain of evidence which suggests energy cannot be created and very little evidence to the contrary, so until someone conclusively shows that energy can be created i find it hard to believe.

                                There are more convincing scientific experiments that prove that the energy efficiency of some processes can higher then 100% (overunity).
                                Here is a link to Professor Ph. M. Kanarev's works presented in English
                                and an example of Low Current Electrolysis of Water where in conclusions one can read:

                                @unknownuser said:

                                Energy efficiency index of the low current electrolysis should be refined, but in any case it will be greater than 10, that’s why there is every reason to think that a way to production of inexpensive hydrogen from water and transition to hydrogen energetic is opened.

                                Not only 'garage inventors', but also scientists prove that it is possible. If societies would only be more aware of possibilities in front of us, it would be easier to find the resources to push them out from labs.

                                Author of [Thea Render for SketchUp](http://www.thearender.com/sketchup)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R Offline
                                  remus
                                  last edited by

                                  πŸ˜‰ <- my unconvinced face

                                  http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P Offline
                                    PeterCharles
                                    last edited by

                                    Some of this sounds a bit like the old Cold Fusion of the late '80's, or even ZETA from the '50's which I remember was going to give power so cheap it wouldn't be worth charging for it!
                                    ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7190813.stm )

                                    Ho, ho, ho

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • AnssiA Offline
                                      Anssi
                                      last edited by

                                      @petercharles said:

                                      Some of this sounds a bit like the old Cold Fusion of the late '80's, or even ZETA from the '50's which I remember was going to give power so cheap it wouldn't be worth charging for it!
                                      ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7190813.stm )

                                      Ho, ho, ho

                                      It sounds like the same old thing, and it is. Five minutes of Googling (the name Kanarev, for instance)brings up links to the same old cold fusion and Steorn etc. nonsense.

                                      Anssi

                                      securi adversus homines, securi adversus deos rem difficillimam adsecuti sunt, ut illis ne voto quidem opus esset

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • T Offline
                                        tomasz
                                        last edited by

                                        @anssi said:

                                        It sounds like the same old thing, and it is. Five minutes of Googling (the name Kanarev, for instance)brings up links to the same old cold fusion and Steorn etc. nonsense.

                                        Steorn and cold fusion? You are mixing thing my friend.
                                        Kanarev brings in most cases Low current electrolysis.

                                        @remus said:

                                        πŸ˜‰ <- my unconvinced face

                                        What doesn't convince you? Graphics of the site? Calculations? Nationality of the author?
                                        Prejudices...

                                        Author of [Thea Render for SketchUp](http://www.thearender.com/sketchup)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • R Offline
                                          remus
                                          last edited by

                                          I probably am prejudiced, but i just find it very hard to believe that someone who has found a method for creating free energy has trouble getting his ideas out to the world.

                                          All it would take is a working sample and he'd be sorted.

                                          The following extract doesnt inspire a lot of confidence, either.

                                          @unknownuser said:

                                          Present days physics students are fooled by main stream physics teachers not only with respect to SRT but they hear other ferry tales about nature. This is one reason why physics students have problems in getting jobs in in-dustry and research institutions.
                                          Our troubled world needs, for example, physicists, who build new useful devices or in-vent new methods for converting matter to energy (fusion does not work well and many people hate uranium) instead of looking for new crazy particles based on unproven theories.

                                          p.s. I will buy you a pint if the conservation of energy is shown to be wrong πŸ‘

                                          http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Mike LuceyM Offline
                                            Mike Lucey
                                            last edited by

                                            Time will tell. Just a thought! In order to protect these inventions, patents will have to be granted. This means that FULL data will be available to the public. At this stage the facts will come the light ... excuse the pun.

                                            Mike

                                            Support us so we can support you! Upgrade to Premium Membership!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement