Color coding Components Plugin or Dynamic Component Question
-
@sdmitch said:
so the 8" wide face gets a different color that the 10" wide face on the same beam.
Yes, ideally.
Otherwise I'd need to setup a color system of gradients for the entire timber to be a specific color matched to a specific size.... -
To bad you didn't think of this in the beginning where you could have colored the faces when you made the components but the solution seems to be simple enough. So, if you could provide a base model to test on, I'll be happy to give it a shot.
-
@sdmitch said:
To bad you didn't think of this in the beginning where you could have colored the faces when you made the components but the solution seems to be simple enough. So, if you could provide a base model to test on, I'll be happy to give it a shot.
I can build 20-30-40 library components and use them... but sometimes I get AutoCAD data or SketchUp models from clients / partners... I can guarantee you that those will not be built with my components.
I'll post up a test model later tonight. Really though, all we are doing, that I cannot do as I don't code or know Ruby, is color a face within a component based on its width. Its width of course, is determined by its orientation in the model though.
I tried doing this with a dynamic component... but didn't get very far.
I have also played around with embedding dimensions into a component on a layer I can toggle on and off - but that removes the ability for the component to be a solid...Thanks for the help!
-
bmike,
Did you forget to post the model?
Yes the faces bounding box dimensions change depending on orientation in the model but that is not a problem.
-
@sdmitch said:
bmike,
Did you forget to post the model?
Yes the faces bounding box dimensions change depending on orientation in the model but that is not a problem.
sorry, got involved with family stuff over the holiday weekend.
attached are 2 models - 2014 and V8.i have created an array of timber off to the side with colors and sizes.
depending on the client i work in either whole inch, or nominal, so coloring might get complicated in that7.5" to 8" = green (8x timber), etc.
if that isn't possible then we can add another shade of the same color for the whole inch or nominal size.
-
Took a look at both of the models posted and I'm a little confused. In the 4X? and 6X?, the two largest beams seem to be the same size but are colored differently. Also, the materials used, are they imported or picked from a materials palette?
-
One common way of color coding loosely mimics the order of visible spectral colors.
This set is used to mark electrical resistors and colored conductors in certain cabling.` __0. Black
- Brown
- Red
- Orange
- Yellow
- Green
- Blue
- Violet
- Gray
- [highlight=#000000:2uojssqf]White[/highlight:2uojssqf]`
-
Another thot.
Could the faces in the component definitions were placed upon layers named for the width (ie, "7.5 wide",) then "Color by Layer" could be toggled on / off at will. The face "colors" would actually be layer colors ?
-
@dan rathbun said:
Another thot.
Could the faces in the component definitions were placed upon layers named for the width (ie, "7.5 wide",) then "Color by Layer" could be toggled on / off at will. The face "colors" would actually be layer colors ?
that is clever... would allow me to keep styles for presentation, without affecting overall model.
layers would then be 'T-8x' 'T-10x' etc.
-
@sdmitch said:
Took a look at both of the models posted and I'm a little confused. In the 4X? and 6X?, the two largest beams seem to be the same size but are colored differently. Also, the materials used, are they imported or picked from a materials palette?
nope, you are not confused. those last ones should have grown another 2". operator error on my part.
new models attached here.colors were picked from the 'color by name' palette.
Advertisement