Tunstall Court
-
It's frickin awesome, John!
Do you know which parts are historic, and which parts are later-day addition? That flat-roofed second story piece on the right looks like it was an addition; it lacks the detailing of the rest of the house.
-
Thank you Elmer & Cotty.
Mike I think the next stage is those magical fire starting fairies!Daniel, It's all historical and original, although like almost all buildings the focus was on the front facade as you can see in the detailing at the rear, even though Lord Furness was the 6th richest person in the world at the time.
The "flat roof" section needs the roof light details adding as you can see in the pictures.She must have been impressive in her prime.
John
-
Great modeling and project! Thanks for the photos. So you broke in? The skylights and light wells are interesting. Some areas still look pretty good.
-
Would one say this architecture was "looking back", even for 1893? One thing, given the wealthy Owner and the usual British approach to these estates, it appears to demonstrate great restraint.
-
@pbacot said:
Would one say this iarchitecture was "looking back", even for 1893? One thing, given the wealthy Owner and the usual British approach to these estates, it appears to demonstrate great restraint.
Although it predates Edward VII's reign by 7 years, it looks like an example of Edwardian architecture. This was probably one of many houses, hence the "modest" size for an English Lord and shipping magnate.
-
-
Impressive as always.
-
Not sure if it's just me, but I can't see any renders in either Firefox or IE. The photographs appear fine, though?
-
All I see is photos in fire fox... At least I think they're photos. With Tadema you never know.
-
I saw the SU model shots earlier, but looks like they are missing from the first post... Would love to see more of this amazing model.
-
Sorry I should have explained the reason for the posts edit at the time.
I had to remove the images until a dispute over them being commercial/personal renderings is resolved, regardless the images will be re-posted tomorrow. Once again my apologies.
John -
Oh wow... It's spectacular.
-
John, are you going to model the gate houses?
-
Marvelous ! -
@tadema said:
Sorry I should have explained the reason for the posts edit at the time.
I had to remove the images until a dispute over them being commercial/personal renderings is resolved, regardless the images will be re-posted tomorrow. Once again my apologies.
Johnreally?! what's the world coming to!
staggering work and detail John!
my only crit is the burnt shadows make the building look like its floating. but i'm just nit picking!
-
Here's the old girl...
[attachment=0:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia0 -->1400 2.jpg<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=12:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia12 -->01.jpg<!-- ia12 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=11:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia11 -->02.jpg<!-- ia11 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=10:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia10 -->03.jpg<!-- ia10 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=9:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia9 -->04.jpg<!-- ia9 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=8:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia8 -->05.jpg<!-- ia8 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=7:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia7 -->06.jpg<!-- ia7 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=6:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia6 -->07.jpg<!-- ia6 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=5:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia5 -->08.jpg<!-- ia5 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=4:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia4 -->09.jpg<!-- ia4 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=3:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia3 -->10.jpg<!-- ia3 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=2:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia2 -->11.jpg<!-- ia2 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]
[attachment=1:3j1v7d57]<!-- ia1 -->12.jpg<!-- ia1 -->[/attachment:3j1v7d57]maybe she was loved once!
John -
Thank you Ely.
Oli, I knew she was floating but after you pointed it out I couldn't leave it alone
Not sure if the drive would ever have been stone, maybe a little aging at a latter date is in order.thanks
John -
ah what a difference!! looks perfect now! I still can't get over the details, they really become evident on the hidden line exports.
-
Very nice model! And I like the landscaping in the render foreground.
-
Thank you everyone.
There's a reply missing above were I replied to Peter & Daniel
I must have hit preview instead of post!The planning application was withdrawn before the meeting to be re-listed at a latter date. The developers wants to carry out a structural survey! Postponing the inevitable.
John
Advertisement