MR2 broke plugin during C extension require
-
Before MR2 I was able to load the standard C extensions that we are distributing with our installation. I use some rubygems that require openssl.so, for example.
After upgrading I'm getting an error:
load "Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.so" Error: #<SyntaxError: (eval):0:inload': C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.so:1: Invalid char\220' in expression>Was the Ruby interpreter updated for this release (1.8.6 patch level on Windows)? It seems to be having trouble reading the libraries.
-
Hmm, doesn't look like it was.
RUBY_VERSION 1.8.6 RUBY_PATCHLEVEL 287Actually I just upgraded my laptop's SU, which is XP and it's loading. I have tested it on 2 Vista computers (one of which worked before MR2, and the other I did a totally fresh installation of SU and the plugin) and both are broken.
-
Ah, so I needed to leave off the ".so" part of the path.
So that was the problem using
loadin the Ruby console, but now the file is not found (which actually is the error I was having originally but then I started getting the other one in the console).Getting this error now:
Error Loading File light_stanza_extension.rb 126: The specified module could not be found. - C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.soI attached a screenshot as proof the file does exist in the correct folder and that my load paths are correct.
-
Let's see the
light_stanza_extension.rbfile, please.Does it use a path with backslashes, or forward slashes ??
-
It does not matter (at console or in script,) if you have the proper paths in the
$LOAD_PATHarray, then userequire('openssl')instead of:
load "Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.so"BTW: the "\220" char is the backslash, aka the method call:
220.chr() -
@dan rathbun said:
Let's see the
light_stanza_extension.rbfile, please.Does it use a path with backslashes, or forward slashes ??
The error is only showing that file because it's the entry point for the plugin. I'm not requiring anything in that file, and certainly not openssl.so.
It's nested several requires later, when I require the RestClient library, which is a 3rd-party library which itself includes openssl.
-
-
Hmm well I just reinstalled SketchUp to this version:
http://www.filehippo.com/download_google_sketchup/8248/
And it still can't find openssl.so
So perhaps it's not a problem with MR2...
-
You could try:
Sketchup.require('openssl')
or
Sketchup.require('openssl.so')it's a modified version of the
Kernel.requiremethod. -
By the way.. what are the green checkmarks over the folder icons mean ?
-
@dan rathbun said:
By the way.. what are the green checkmarks over the folder icons mean ?
It's TortoiseSVN (I use SVN for version control). It doesn't modify the files and has never been a problem in over 200 revisions.
-
require('openssl') Error: #<LoadError: C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.so: 126: The specified module could not be found. - C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.so> (eval) C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/openssl.rb:17 (eval):0:inrequire'
(eval):0
Sketchup.require('openssl')
false`Interesting... does that mean anything to you? The latter returned false. Was it successful or no?
-
It seems like TIG reported problems with access to Vista (64bit) folders during the last beta round, concerning the new rbz installer, but I thot the issue was resolved.
Check file permissions on the folders.
-
@draftomatic said:
Sketchup.require('openssl')
false[/ruby]Interesting... does that mean anything to you? The latter returned false. Was it successful or no?
It means (to me,) that [ruby:2l6gl0ii]Sketchup.require[/ruby:2l6gl0ii] still does not work as it should (rubywise.)
[ruby:2l6gl0ii]require[/ruby:2l6gl0ii] is supposed to return [ruby:2l6gl0ii]true[/ruby:2l6gl0ii] if the load was successful, [ruby:2l6gl0ii]false[/ruby:2l6gl0ii] if the file has ALREADY been loaded, and raise a [ruby:2l6gl0ii]LoadError[/ruby:2l6gl0ii] (or other,) exception otherwise.
Previous to the last MR, I had filed a bugreport on [ruby:2l6gl0ii]Sketchup.require[/ruby:2l6gl0ii] for various reasons, but one issue was that it was returning numerical error codes (which is a C thing, not a the Ruby way.)
-
Thanks Dan.
So, per your suggestion, I started going through the libraries that
require 'openssl'and replacing it withSketchup.require 'openssl'It seemed to fixed one after the other, until I got this:
Error Loading File C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.so 126: The specified module could not be found. - C:/Program Files (x86)/Google/Google SketchUp 8/Plugins/Light Stanza/lib/Ruby186/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-mswin32/openssl.soSorry, had a copy/paste error a second ago. Fixed it.
-
Oh I REMEMBER what the problem is !!!!
It Windows and how it handles custom icons for folders. When you change the icon for a folder, Windows sets it's read-only attribute (or similar.)
This messes up Ruby.It's your Tortoise install changing the icons that is causing the problem.
TIG is the one that figured this out during beta.
-
@dan rathbun said:
It's your Tortoise install changing the icons that is causing the problem.
Eh, I don't think so. We also have a packaged installer that does not include any of the svn data. In fact I just stripped my plugin from the Plugins folder and used the installer, and still getting the same errors...
-
@dan rathbun said:
It seems like TIG reported problems with access to Vista (64bit) folders during the last beta round, concerning the new rbz installer, but I thot the issue was resolved.
Check file permissions on the folders.
I don't suppose you have any references for this?
Scott Lininger promised to get me into the next beta last time I met with him; unfortunately that doesn't help me today
-
If you copy the icon modified folders into the install package, they will have the modified flags. TIG had to completely recreate new default folders, and copy the files into the new folders.
REALLY I am not making this up. It's a really stupid thing that Microsoft did.
-
@draftomatic said:
@dan rathbun said:
It seems like TIG reported problems with access to Vista (64bit) folders during the last beta round, concerning the new rbz installer, but I thot the issue was resolved.
Check file permissions on the folders.
I don't suppose you have any references for this?
Scott Lininger promised to get me into the next beta last time I met with him; unfortunately that doesn't help me today
Give me hour or so. I'll see what I can send you from the thread in the beta forum.
Advertisement