sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Billboard 3D trees, results.

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Gallery
    13 Posts 7 Posters 4.3k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • RichardR Offline
      Richard
      last edited by

      God I've got to fix the colour and brightness of my laptop - thats dark!

      [BUILTBRAND.COM.AU](http://builtbrand.com.au/)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        Phil Rader AIA
        last edited by

        Can you expand on your item #6. IE which program is linking to the MXM file. Is SU linking to and MXM file?

        http://www.philrader.com

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • RichardR Offline
          Richard
          last edited by

          @unknownuser said:

          Can you expand on your item #6. IE which program is linking to the MXM file. Is SU linking to and MXM file?

          Yes phil, I just used the clip map B/W as the map in SU and then linked the SU material to the MXM. The MXM is pretty simple just colour, clip and displacement maps!

          [BUILTBRAND.COM.AU](http://builtbrand.com.au/)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            diegog321
            last edited by

            Hi Richard
            Im very impressed with your work. Is too bad that we have to find ways to bypass skecthup inability to work with more than a few thousand polygons. Even on the most powerful computers.
            Can you share your mxm file and component, so other can test it as well and perhaps build a collection in the future.
            Have you tried rendering these trees in top view? Do they look real πŸ˜† ?
            In any case they are an excellent work
            congratulations

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • RichardR Offline
              Richard
              last edited by

              Thanks mate! Unfortunately I cant share the models or images in the MXM's due to Onyx licensing!

              [BUILTBRAND.COM.AU](http://builtbrand.com.au/)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D Offline
                dtrarch
                last edited by

                Richard

                Good tree but no shadows on trunk.
                I have the same deal using ATL 3d trees for flats.
                Question is the detail in trunk and branches more important than shadows.
                In ATL one can do it either way.
                Opinion please.

                ATL tree attached.
                TREE TEST 200.psd.pngTREE TEST 201.psd.png

                dtr

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • broomstickB Offline
                  broomstick
                  last edited by

                  dtrarch, that's what I was going to say too: although I don't like particularly the atl trees. Using onyx the result is much better IMO. πŸ˜„

                  Nice job Gaieus!

                  This metod also works for 2D props in photoshop πŸ˜‰

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • RichardR Offline
                    Richard
                    last edited by

                    @dtrarch said:

                    Richard

                    Good tree but no shadows on trunk.

                    Mate I used some low transparency on the leaves (pre V2 to get some softer leaves) shadows went unfortunately. I was testing a few things at the same time!

                    With maxwell use of 3d trees comes at little cost, once any 3d highpoly asset is used you are forced into the studio app anyway given SU's polylimits!

                    Onyx trees are the bomb! And completely customizable!


                    GUM SMALL OLD LOSS 12.JPG


                    MAPLE MED AUTUMN LOSS 10.JPG

                    [BUILTBRAND.COM.AU](http://builtbrand.com.au/)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • D Offline
                      diegog321
                      last edited by

                      I thought so...
                      When I get a little time im going to make some from freeware trees, Perhaps we can compare them with onyx but is going to take more time to them.
                      Hope to see you improve πŸ˜„
                      what will if you if you render the tree in perspective like an isometry. It gets me curious.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • honoluludesktopH Offline
                        honoluludesktop
                        last edited by

                        Richard, "low transparency to soften", nice tip for a beginner like me to explore. Is that why some of the bunches of leaves in the center of a cluster look diffuse? Maybe that's the way it looks when the edge between the leaves and sky is well integrated. This got me to thinking that for the sake of the perspective, perhaps the reverse is better. Diffuse at the more distant edges, and sharper on the surfaces closest to the observer. Have you tried it that way?

                        I could cutup the tree into sections that can be blurred, or made a little transparent to achieve the desired effect. Best perhaps for mid-range 2d veggies? BTW, do I misunderstand this post? What is a 3d billboard tree, as vs a 2d tree?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • RichardR Offline
                          Richard
                          last edited by

                          @honoluludesktop said:

                          Richard, "low transparency to soften", nice tip for a beginner like me to explore. Is that why some of the bunches of leaves in the center of a cluster look diffuse? Maybe that's the way it looks when the edge between the leaves and sky is well integrated. This got me to thinking that for the sake of the perspective, perhaps the reverse is better. Diffuse at the more distant edges, and sharper on the surfaces closest to the observer. Have you tried it that way?

                          I could cutup the tree into sections that can be blurred, or made a little transparent to achieve the desired effect. Best perhaps for mid-range 2d veggies? BTW, do I misunderstand this post? What is a 3d billboard tree, as vs a 2d tree?

                          Sorry mate, I thought I had replied earlier!

                          I didn't play any further than this test given the results of billboards (yes same as 2d, just a commonly used term for same!) in rendering just has trouble compeating with 3d so I dropped the tests, though I did some later tests just using the map on a sandbox tooled single mesh and bought forward and back the obvious parts of the plant, I do this with a few plants I use to get better sun shadow response and it worked ok on the tree too. Cant find the tests now!

                          [BUILTBRAND.COM.AU](http://builtbrand.com.au/)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Buy SketchPlus
                          Buy SUbD
                          Buy WrapR
                          Buy eBook
                          Buy Modelur
                          Buy Vertex Tools
                          Buy SketchCuisine
                          Buy FormFonts

                          Advertisement