Bush vs Shoe
-
I think you presume a lot . Not all is like you see on the TV or read in paper. Yes they may not have same cultural values like us but if you were in their shoes (excuse my punn) you would think diferrently.
-
A little something to lighten the mood:
Not mine btw.
-
@sepo said:
I think you presume a lot . Not all is like you see on the TV or read in paper. Yes they may not have same cultural values like us but if you were in their shoes (excuse my punn) you would think diferrently.
Let me try this once more...
My point is that the man who threw the shoe, yes, I agree he has a right to regard Bush as a tyrant who invaded his country, was able to get away with it because he is protected by the very principles he wants to overthrow.
I am not saying that all Middle Eastern people are evil, I am simply pointing out the discordant nature of the situation as I see it.
As far as 'cultural values' go, well, I'll leave that up you to make your own evaluations as to which you would prefer.
DE -
@double espresso said:
My point is that the man who threw the shoe, yes, I agree he has a right to regard Bush as a tyrant who invaded his country, was able to get away with it because he is protected by the very principles he wants to overthrow.
Excusez-moi? I have to ask: have you been taking acid?
(Hi Sid!
) -
There is no doubt in my mind where I belong culturally. I am European and proud of it.
And if by protection you mean braking an arm, ribs and good kicking well .... -
Hi Stinkie
-
@unknownuser said:
@double espresso said:
My point is that the man who threw the shoe, yes, I agree he has a right to regard Bush as a tyrant who invaded his country, was able to get away with it because he is protected by the very principles he wants to overthrow.
Excusez-moi? I have to ask: have you been taking acid?
(Hi Sid!
)Why would you think I'm on acid?
Clearly, the intent of my comment has been lost in translation. I give up. -
Unless your initial comment was meant to be ironic, and I didn't get that, nothing was 'lost in translation'. I asked whether you're on acid because of your bizarre assumtion the Iraqi journalist wants to overthrow the principles that protect him. Clearly you're assuming far too much.
-
@sepo said:
As I said before it is very easy to be of high moral when does not affect you. I have good experience of war and that is where I am coming from. My post is not there to change really anyones mind.
DOESN'T AFFECT ME?
Eight years and now look at my country! Military trashed. Economy screwed. Human rights degraded. International honor in the gutter.
Fortunately not all those who experience war become terrorists or even shoe throwers. Or then where would we be? We have some of our greatest leaders from the experience of wars, sad as that seems.
BTW what did I do to make the world a safer place? For one I voted against Bush twice, and then I voted against McCain. (just 'cause I can see another ad hominem flying in from the other side.)
-
@unknownuser said:
Unless your initial comment was meant to be ironic, and I didn't get that, nothing was 'lost in translation'. I asked whether you're on acid because of your bizarre assumtion the Iraqi journalist wants to overthrow the principles that protect him. Clearly you're assuming far too much.
Unfortunately, you seem to be so consumed by your hatred of Bush that whatever I say will always be related back to him. The principles that I am speaking of are the ones that all of us who live in Western Society embrace. Freedom of speech and religion, equality for women etc. We take these rights for granted and it occurred to me while I was watching how this thread evolved that while the Iraqi reporter obviously hates Bush and all he stands for, he will probably escape punishment for his action because of the Western principles he deplores.
I wonder if he threw a shoe at a member of the Saudi Royal Family he would fare so well. -
I just do not see the big deal in all of this, if the reporter was an American and he threw two rotten tomatoes and missed what would happen to him?
The shoe is not a deadly weapon and it's the muslim equivalent of a western 'rotten tomato'.I doubt that the American reporter would end up with such severe injuries and possible 15 years imprisonment.
-
@double espresso said:
@unknownuser said:
Unless your initial comment was meant to be ironic, and I didn't get that, nothing was 'lost in translation'. I asked whether you're on acid because of your bizarre assumtion the Iraqi journalist wants to overthrow the principles that protect him. Clearly you're assuming far too much.
Unfortunately, you seem to be so consumed by your hatred of Bush that whatever I say will always be related back to him. The principles that I am speaking of are the ones that all of us who live in Western Society embrace. Freedom of speech and religion, equality for women etc. We take these rights for granted and it occurred to me while I was watching how this thread evolved that while the Iraqi reporter obviously hates Bush and all he stands for, he will probably escape punishment for his action because of the Western principles he deplores.
I wonder if he threw a shoe at a member of the Saudi Royal Family he would fare so well.I understood the journalist is/was punished/hurt because Maliki was so close to the incident. Your point about Western principles is not lost on me, by the way.
-
@unknownuser said:
The principles that I am speaking of are the ones that all of us who live in Western Society embrace.
Does that include Bush's lies that he had strong evidence that Iraq was linked to 911 and had Weapons of Mass destruction? Claims that he later denied making. Great principles.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7SUBGtRIiXoAs I said, he was lucky it was just a shoe. Solo is right, if an american or european had thrown fruit at an arab leader, the news channels would bill it as hilarious and repeat the video for weeks.
Incidentally it seems the shoe thrower was beaten in custody.
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/news/shoe-throwing-journalist-beaten-according-brother-20081217Lets put this in perspective, on one side is a man who lied and started a war.
On the other side a man throws a sandal and misses. -
@linea said:
Lets put this in perspective, on one side is a man who lied and started a war.
On the other side a man throws a sandal and misses.I'll drink to that. Let's leave this and go over and see how Kevin's doing on that car.
Why is the Google ad with this thread now: "Arab Women--Hot!" ???
-
@pbacot said:
Why is the Google ad with this thread now: "Arab Women--Hot!" ???
These Google ads are creeping me out- I was just thinking about hot Arabic women!
-
Alan, I just noticed something, we are almost perfectly synchronised- look at our post count!
It's like when women who work together gradually synchronise their monthlies, especially....
...hot arab women.
p.s. I wonder if this contravenes the Google ad sense rules? I'll have to check the rules on my powerful feature-packed Hewlett-Packard laptop while I sit here drinking a refreshing ice cold Coca-Cola.
-
@double espresso said:
@unknownuser said:
Unless your initial comment was meant to be ironic, and I didn't get that, nothing was 'lost in translation'. I asked whether you're on acid because of your bizarre assumtion the Iraqi journalist wants to overthrow the principles that protect him. Clearly you're assuming far too much.
Unfortunately, you seem to be so consumed by your hatred of Bush that whatever I say will always be related back to him. The principles that I am speaking of are the ones that all of us who live in Western Society embrace. Freedom of speech and religion, equality for women etc. We take these rights for granted and it occurred to me while I was watching how this thread evolved that while the Iraqi reporter obviously hates Bush and all he stands for, he will probably escape punishment for his action because of the Western principles he deplores.
I wonder if he threw a shoe at a member of the Saudi Royal Family he would fare so well.The point I was trying to make was that neither of us knows whether or not the journalist 'deplores' Western priniples. As I said, you assume far too much. I've posted this link before, and I will post it again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor.
As far as I'm concerned, this concludes our little debate (yours and mine, that is), unless you come up with 100 % watertight proof the forementioned journalist is indeed something of an islamist obscurantist who strongly opposes freedom of speech, equality for women, etc.
As a side note: I find it surprising that when someone points out that you assume too much, you answer by adding another assumption to the mix ("Unfortunately, you seem to be so consumed by your hatred of Bush (...)"). This is higly illogical.
-
You two do realise that by repeating the words "hot arab women" that you are reinforcing the bias of the ads on this page? And the more you mention hot arab women, the more ads containing the terms hot, or arab, or women will appear. I think it would be a good idea not to mention any of those words...hot or arab or women...any more.
-
@unknownuser said:
I understood the journalist is/was punished/hurt because Maliki was so close to the incident.
How did you arrived on that one,
I supose Bush is validated, he finally found shoe of mass distruction (size 10 to be precise).
-
@alan fraser said:
You two do realise that by repeating the words "hot arab women" that you are reinforcing the bias of the ads on this page? And the more you mention hot arab women, the more ads containing the terms hot, or arab, or women will appear. I think it would be a good idea not to mention any of those words...hot or arab or women...any more.
Shame, the aim was a bit too much off. Next time use laser guided shoes.
Advertisement