Why vote Obama?
-
I was not aware thet there was much disagreement within the conservative ranks about her, I assumed by the 'hype' that they were all energized and hypnotized by her presence.
What I do not quite understand as is the talk of a 'Reagan republican' vs an 'Ike republican' vs a 'Nixon republican', what is the differences?
-
-
-
What the heck:
-
I'll join in with the sophomoric symbol crap:
-
Aw, Ron, c'mon. Can't us lefties have a laugh?
-
Lefties having a laugh.
-
lol! Oops! I meant:
-
Today I was reading my daily leftist blogs and one especially stood out,it was in regards to democrats being pessimistic. The story is that '04 defeat against Bush really hurt the 'lefty boys' in Washington and now even with all the overwhelming lead and the McCain campaign drained of any new ideas or direction that they are not sure they can actually win.
Without going into the story, there was a quote that was brilliant, from an un-named democratic senator
"Don't underestimate the capacity of Democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory,"
The article is by Tucker Carlson and he starts with a little test ...
Wondering if you're really a Democrat? Here's a quick way to find out: Given everything the Democratic party has going for it this year—the overwhelming financial advantage, the legions of new voters, George W. Bush—do you believe the Obama campaign could still somehow, in the final moments, find a way to blow it and lose this election?
If you answered yes, you're a Democrat.
-
-
Now Obama’s got Colin Powell AND Google?
http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/10/21/now-obamas-got-colin-powell-and-google/
-
@tomsdesk said:
What the "mavericks" are doing with this seems to be case in point:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/10/biden-to-suppor.html
Also please note he said "if Obama is in the Whitehouse" not "only if Obama is in the Whitehouse" (how they twist the true into the false and then actually say it out loud is just crazy)...either candidate will most likely be tested in this manner: nearly all since Kennedy have been also. (At least Obama won't have be dealing with a "crisis" from a republican Congress as well :`)
Good boy, Tom.
-
@solo said:
Now Obama’s got Colin Powell AND Google?
http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/10/21/now-obamas-got-colin-powell-and-google/
Barack Hussein Obama has always had Google. No surprise here.
Tell me you're proud of Biden. Come on, be honest about this, please. You too, Tom.
-
Proud? what's to be proud of?, he ain't my daddy. I support and trust in his abillities, and maybe when he is elected will I be proud of the America that made the right choice.
Oh, another republican crossed over .... Ken Adelman
-
Ken Adelman...don't know him. Be careful, don't get too cocky here, there's plenty of time left for either one of them to hang themselves.
Do not underestimate the Bill Ayers anchor on Obama.
-
I am not cocky at all, in fact I'm concerned of such a scenario, as posted above ....
"Don't underestimate the capacity of Democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory,"
-
@solo said:
Proud? what's to be proud of?, he ain't my daddy...
Sorry, I wasn't clear. Are you proud of Biden's latest gaffe regarding the "testing" of Obama? This is Biden at his embarrassingly best. His ego won't let him stay in the background and this could prove fatal. We'll see.
-
@solo said:
I am not cocky at all, in fact I'm concerned of such a scenario, as posted above ....
"Don't underestimate the capacity of Democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory,"
I know...2000 and 2004 must have been a bummer. I was surprised Bush won in 2004, I really was. If Obama loses, I see steady work for morticians.
-
I did a Google news search and only one report from Faux news appeared, guess it's just not news worthy to the other networks, so it's a non-issue.
Y'all are grasping at desperate straws now ...tsk, tsk.
-
Really?? You haven't heard what Biden said? This story is fairly current....today.
Advertisement