Comments please

goon of doom

While I find the content VERY good without doubt there is some very well done imagery to explore. That is the good bit.
The counterpoint is #1 . The solo's space logo. childish. #2. I felt like I was being spamed with the registration page.

Too many great pics to pick a favorite but I liked some of the airplanes. Would love to see a Northrup YB-46 flying wing done in your style. Some of the furniture was interesting some of it would not work at all. Of the rendered structures I loved allot of it and some of it did nothing for me.

The work overall was very refined and clearly done by an expert The logo was done by someone other than a creative. Which leads me to doubt you.

GoD

solo

Thanks for your input, I liked the contrast of the logo which I believe is an improvement over the template one. This is the kind of comments I require so I will consider your point and work on a new logo tomorrow.

Chris Fullmer

Coming along great. I thought there was too much text at the bottom of the main page though. I'm even wondering if maybe the front page should contain itself to fit on the screen w/o having to scroll down at all.

I like the images. The one I like best is with the houses and hte mountains and the sunset. Its great detail in the models. My only comlaint is that the bright sunset in the image does not match up with the shadows in the model.

Good job though, really nice work!

Chris

PS I liked all hte genuine winks. !thanks! I'll just learn to get over it now that I know they are actually genuine

solo

Okay, I compromised on the logo, is that better?

Frederick has come up with a solution for a gallery that scrolls so I hope to implement that soon.

As for the info thing, I will try reduce that or make a new page for info and inquiries.

Thanks for all the suggestions guys.

boofredlay

There is no apostrophe in the logo. Should it not be SOLO'S PLACE, like the rest of your site?

solo

<--- Grimace

Yup there should, but that font does not have that option, just a box. I could change the font and probably should as it is too ... (as goon said) childish, and I kinda see his point, but then again it's playfull and I have a whole section of playful crap and cartoon characters that work well with the logo.

Chris Fullmer

Maybe its a question of how you're trying to sell yourself in general. What is the main image you want to present? It might be possible to get playful work even if you have a fairly serious logo. But if your logo is too playful, will people who want serious designs be turned off? or vice versa?

Maybe the logo switches on each page? That might be too much though and you might start losing your identity if its not constant.

Chris

boofredlay

Oooo, in addition to Chris' comments.

Maybe in the playful area you could have the playful logo but it says: "Solo's Plays" or "Solo's Play" or some such thing.

Just a thought.

Dave R

Pete, you have an excellent collection of work there. Very nice website.

HFM

@solo said:

<--- Grimace

Yup there should, but that font does not have that option, just a box. I could change the font and probably should as it is too ... (as goon said) childish, and I kinda see his point, but then again it's playfull and I have a whole section of playful crap and cartoon characters that work well with the logo.

Another option, that could be used as a banner, is to create a logo. The way you use 'Solo's Place' now with multiple fonts [banner, watermark] is distracting. This makes it easier to change a font when you don't like it anymore.

The images are awesome btw; and I love the cartoon section !
But the site itself is too basic for the stuff you put on there.

Buy dreamweaver [if you haven't allready] learn basic html in 2 hours and create something a bit more stunning than this
[<-- this is by no means an arrogant smilie ]

tomsdesk

Pete, blown away by the site and especially by the images again! Now reading other's suggestions I can't wait to see the finished product.

As to credit to others: though I'm quite flattered, I'd say there is no need to credit each image. A nod to this site as a resource might be nice, but still you did nearly all of the work presented...and easily have the skill to do the rest. Besides, wasn't the section named "Renderings"...so no need at all?

(Now if you'd care to send me high-res of the lighthouse instead...:`)

mateo soletic

Pete,
Its really coming along nice.

smartsizer

@unknownuser said:

@unknownuser said:

I am by no means a furniture designer but recently played around with a few ideas,

Don't sell yourself short with this statement. Just because these have never been physically built does not mean you are not a furniture designer. These are some of the coolest furniture designs I have seen in a while.

I hope this helps you.

I have designed and made furniture for a living for 25+ years. Much has been custom furniture, but years have been spent designing for mass production also. Knowing how to make something that can be manufactured economically, and be durable and practical is essential, (for commercial purposes) but it is also just an application of technical principles. Any engineering-type mind can do that with proper information and experience. What you display is mastery of the creative arena of the design process. This is something much less common and more wonderful. I absolutely consider you a furniture designer.

This is an impressive body of work. Best of luck!

kwistenbiebel

I missed this thread (lots to read which I will),
but I just drop in to say that I really love the style of the website Pete, and the content is well....you know, awesome material !