sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • 登入
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    🔌 Smart Spline | Fluid way to handle splines for furniture design and complex structures. Download

    New Residential

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 Gallery
    26 貼文 19 Posters 1.8k 瀏覽 19 Watching
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • S 離線
      sorgesu
      最後由 編輯

      Tina, these are really amazing. They have such a wonderful quality.
      If you are looking for critique, in search of perfection, it is possible to push one's self and try and find something.
      I have to agree with Mike's comment about the surrounding trees. They are too bright a colour and contrasty and steel from the focus of the building.

      I also agree about tree in front of the doorway. It does obscure. Being semi-transparent really doesn't change that and I have a personal problem with semi-transparent trees anyway. I know it is done in architecture, but I really don't think it is necessary and frankly, its a weird convention. If the tree is really going to obscure something important, use a skimpier tree. Otherwise, if it is just more brick, we get the idea and there is no reason to go transparent.

      In this one the tree actually obscures the doorway and 90 percent of the time the focuse of these renderings should be the doorway. Inviting one in so to speak. Therefore the greatest area of contrast should always be arranged to be at the door. This door is a little too dark and obscured. In fact the window to the left is more contrasty.

      But that was just pushing an academic critique. The overall execution is masterful, the moode delightful the technque wonderful.

      Susan Sorger
      Former Seller Hand Rendered Entourage
      Former Canadian Authorized Training Centre, SketchUp

      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
      • N 離線
        Nick W
        最後由 編輯

        brilliant! love the color, love the detail.

        ps - susan, great critique. I learned a lot from that. 😄

        http://www.nrwiesneski.com

        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
        • T 離線
          tomislavm
          最後由 編輯

          Nice and warm job Tina!

          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
          • B 離線
            bytor
            最後由 編輯

            Tina!

            Absolutely wonderful work - I so enjoy your style. 👍 👍 I think Susan's critique is right on, and I benefitted from looking at you images again to see what she was describing. I hope it was received well because it was very helpfull.

            Bytor

            Find the Cost of Freedom.....

            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
            • tinanneT 離線
              tinanne
              最後由 編輯

              @mike lucey said:

              PS: This is really excellent work for a woman 😉

              Mike, good thing you live so far away 👊 kisses

              Executive Director : American Society of Architectural Illustrators
              AIP 30 Competition opens soon. ASAI.org

              Architectural Rendering

              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
              • tinanneT 離線
                tinanne
                最後由 編輯

                @sorgesu said:

                I have to agree with Mike's comment about the surrounding trees. They are too bright a colour and contrasty and steel from the focus of the building.

                Yes, I agree... I should have made those darker. Thanks for reminding me of that, both of you 😄

                @sorgesu said:

                I also agree about tree in front of the doorway. It does obscure. Being semi-transparent really doesn't change that and I have a personal problem with semi-transparent trees anyway. I know it is done in architecture, but I really don't think it is necessary and frankly, its a weird convention. If the tree is really going to obscure something important, use a skimpier tree. Otherwise, if it is just more brick, we get the idea and there is no reason to go transparent.

                In this one the tree actually obscures the doorway and 90 percent of the time the focuse of these renderings should be the doorway. Inviting one in so to speak. Therefore the greatest area of contrast should always be arranged to be at the door. This door is a little too dark and obscured. In fact the window to the left is more contrasty.

                I totally agree, in this case it was specified by the client that these trees were there and the he would not agree to a change in angle, so..... darn clients 😉

                @sorgesu said:

                But that was just pushing an academic critique. The overall execution is masterful, the moode delightful the technque wonderful.

                Thank you Susan, you know how much I appreciate your input. It is always so valuable!

                And thank you to everyone else as well!!

                Executive Director : American Society of Architectural Illustrators
                AIP 30 Competition opens soon. ASAI.org

                Architectural Rendering

                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                • 1
                • 2
                • 2 / 2
                • 第一個貼文
                  最後的貼文
                Buy SketchPlus
                Buy SUbD
                Buy WrapR
                Buy eBook
                Buy Modelur
                Buy Vertex Tools
                Buy SketchCuisine
                Buy FormFonts

                Advertisement