Comparing Max & KT
-
PM = photon mapping,
PPT = path tracing (progressive)
BPT = bidirectional path tracing
MLT = Metropolis Light Trasferthese are the different render presets available in KT! the best of both biased and unbiased worlds!

-
Are these renders all done from the same file without adjustment to the lighting after exporting from SU? KT looks by far the best, but I find it hard to believe it is the same lighting scheme. However my only experience is with KT for automated renders.
-
the ligh emiter KT r faces , but Max .point lights
... -
just ...
-
here is the reality ( camera), kt is more real!!!

-
majid,
How experianced are you with 3D max?
-
here is kt again

-
i dont know max 2 much just rendering ( and somtimes lighting)
-
I'm neither a Max or a KT user, but I feel the need to add something nonetheless. I'm like that. Ask me mum.
Here it is: http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/item?siteID=123112&id=5666143&linkID=5572501
Opinion's free, but facts are sacred.
-
here is my last render using su+kt , retouched @ ps

-
for some, put a chisel and hammer in their hand and you will get "David", others, you will get dust.
my point?
One may not judge any render engine by seeing another user's first attempts. They may only judge the user's attempts. -
really good and true poit u have . btw kt is more easy to use and good result 4 me (and i guess other who r new in 3d rendering!) . thanx again Fletch
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register LoginAdvertisement