Method or plugin for subdividing like this sample
-
That's a pity, but thanks fo the explanation. When rendering an architectural subject bevels make a lot of difference in image results and realism. However when working they are too cumbersome and when sending to Layout or CAD to document the building and dimension it, they become even moreof a nuisance.
Having some kind of temporary bevelling that you could toggle, loke subd, would solve the issue.
I guess a lot of us would find that an incredible tool and I thought, for a moment, it would be possible...
Even so,thanks for your time gentlemen!
-
Hi guys
This is what I came up with a few months ago, but it fails when curves or inner loops exist.
Also it uses the offset.rb from Smustard(TM).
By using this combination of soft and smooth you are able to put correct dimensions in both SKP and LO
If you need to get rid of the changes the plugin Fix101 takes care of it.Any ideas to improve this?
#CSR create soften edges for renders
ss = Sketchup.active_model.selection
Sketchup.active_model.start_operation("test")
old_edges = []
new_faces = []
ss.each{|e|old_edges.push e if e.class == Sketchup::Edge}
ss.each{|s|new_faces.push s.offset(-0.0625) if s.class == Sketchup::Face}
old_edges.each{|oe| oe.smooth = true}
new_faces.each{|nf| nf.edges.each{|nfe| nfe.soft = true; nfe.hidden = true}}
Sketchup.active_model.commit_operation
-
After adding offset.rb it worked.
However the old edges are hard and the new ones are soft. -
Can anyone convert it to a plugin?
-
I'm trying...
I think it would work better if it only operated on edges that are hard.
How would one do that? -
And do you think it could have a method for operating at render time or is it too slow for that?
Like tag some objects and apply the effect when hitting Thea's render button and then undo it (using skatter's method)?
-
I don't know yet.
It has some bugs as it's not working correctly on for example a cylinder with soft edges. And some other things that would need solving first. -
I do this sort of thing manually on a daily basis and it is frustrating that a number of plugins come very close to automating much of the process.
A quad version of Round Corner with a subdivision mode (just adding the required loops) would be awesome.
Having more control over the addition of loops in Quad Face Tools would be very helpful. I seem to recall that this is planned for the next version.
For subdivision at render, I think that could be possible with SubD at some point in the future. I imagine that getting it to play nice with all the different render engines will be quite a big ask.
-
@hieru said:
For subdivision at render, I think that could be possible with SubD at some point in the future. I imagine that getting it to play nice with all the different render engines will be quite a big ask.
I remember Thomthom was talking with both Thomas (Jiminy) and Tomasz to make it happen. Maybe it's being developed as we speak, maybe it stalled.
Anyway what I wanted was simply to have raw geometry without bevels, so I could design easily with sketchup and some method to fake bevels so I could render realistically, but I don't want to have permanent bevels.
In the end I always sacrifice bevels so I can keep desiging but the results are always too CG... that's the best option I have for my workflow...
-
@jql said:
I remember Thomthom was talking with both Thomas (Jiminy) and Tomasz to make it happen. Maybe it's being developed as we speak, maybe it stalled.
Yes, some Skatter wisdom would probably help to move things in that direction.
@jql said:
Anyway what I wanted was simply to have raw geometry without bevels, so I could design easily with sketchup and some method to fake bevels so I could render realistically, but I don't want to have permanent bevels.
The way I envisioned that working would involve a new version of Round Corner that adds the loops needed for SubD bevelling and then assigning a SubD @ Render condition to the geometry.
Whilst it wouldn't reduce the geometry/calculations rendered, it would keep models manageable and be partly non-destructive.
Naturally the ideal would be completely non-destructive bevels, but that's not going to happen without major changes to SUp's core engine.
Personally I leave all bevelling until the last minute, when I know there won't be any design changes. Sometimes I'll save non-bevelled versions of components in my project file - just in case.
-
Don't know if it's possible but if so, running a script right before and after render could perhaps create a fairly non destructive workflow.
-
@hieru said:
Personally I leave all bevelling until the last minute, when I know there won't be any design changes. Sometimes I'll save non-bevelled versions of components in my project file - just in case.
LOL... What about last minute changes?
The thing with rendering, in my case, is that I do it to test design and let it cook longer to show it off to my clients.
Bevels make a lot of difference but sincerelly, my clients don't give a damn about that added realism. However I've seen the work of render gurus like yourselves and get frustrated with my results.
So I want bevels, but I don't need them, but I want them, but I don't need them... I guess turning them on and off would be the ideal solution.
-
I agree, turning them on and off would be ideal; but since that isn't possible, you can't avoid destructive bevelling if you want that extra level of realism.
As for last minute changes, I don't run the final renders until the client has fully signed off on the design and they are aware that no major revisions are possible. Up to that point I present draft renders without the bevelling.
-
I emailed Thomasz and he said it is possible to run a script before render and another after.
So in theory if we had a bevelscript and ran it before render and then undo that after we would have a non destructive way of doing it. -
@hieru said:
As for last minute changes, I don't run the final renders until the client has fully signed off on the design and they are aware that no major revisions are possible. Up to that point I present draft renders without the bevelling.
In that regard I'm my own client and I never agree that major revisions aren't possible
@pixero said:
I emailed Thomasz and he said it is possible to run a script before render and another after.
So in theory if we had a bevelscript and ran it before render and then undo that after we would have a non destructive way of doing it.The ideal solution would be to do this in the shader with the bevel procedural or, like I used to, with the wireframe procedural, that Presto doesn't support.
-
Just stumbled on this post. Maybe I can shine a little light on this for all of you. Your attacking this "bevel" issue from the wrong end.
I use TwilightV2 Pro and it has exactly what your looking for. In Twilight it's called "Bevel Modifier", you assign it to the material of choice, for example your kitchen counter top material. The "Bevel Modifier" lets you set the perimeters for how you want the bevel to appear in your render. I have no idea how it works except it's all done on the render side , it doesn't physically change model geometry. I do know it works like a champ.
Instead of coming up with scripts to run tiny little bevels all over your model check into your render engine of choice and see if it has a bevel function like Twilight. If not go to their forum and plant the seed that they add a bevel function asap. -
@tuna1957 said:
Just stumbled on this post. Maybe I can shine a little light on this for all of you. Your attacking this "bevel" issue from the wrong end.
I use TwilightV2 Pro and it has exactly what your looking for. In Twilight it's called "Bevel Modifier", you assign it to the material of choice, for example your kitchen counter top material. The "Bevel Modifier" lets you set the perimeters for how you want the bevel to appear in your render. I have no idea how it works except it's all done on the render side , it doesn't physically change model geometry. I do know it works like a champ.
Instead of coming up with scripts to run tiny little bevels all over your model check into your render engine of choice and see if it has a bevel function like Twilight. If not go to their forum and plant the seed that they add a bevel function asap.LOL... if you only knew...
We here are planting that seed for as long as I remember.
Twilight comes from the Kerkythea engine, if I'm not mistaken. KT used to have it and I guess most of the askers here used that engine to some extent.
-
JQL, sorry your "gardening" efforts haven't born fruit. Your right that Twilight has it's roots in KT. Really surprised that other render engines don't have a bevel function, particularly those that are a lot more pricey than Twilight. "planting a seed" might have been the wrong term. Sounds like it's time for screaming, shouting and name calling.....
Advertisement