Lighting Project
-
Thanks. I was wondering what caused those lines.
-
Very nice remus.
-
@remus said:
Indigo indeed, and it only took 18 hours

18 hours! that's like watching paint dry
Seriously, though that's not a good carbon footprint. Look at all the electricity that was used just to make a 2d light bulb, look 3d.Are we all going insane?

-
<twisted logic>
I dont own a car (or plan to), so that sort of cancels it out.
</twisted logic>
-
@remus said:
<twisted logic>
I dont own a car (or plan to), so that sort of cancels it out.
</twisted logic>
So why did it take that long? (even Maxwell does not take that long)
- slow CPU?
- slow rendering execution?
- other?
-
In this case I think it was a combination of slowish CPU, large output size and the single light source.
Could I ask what makes you think maxwell would be faster? I would have thought the render times would have been pretty similar really.
-
@remus said:
In this case I think it was a combination of slowish CPU, large output size and the single light source.
Could I ask what makes you think maxwell would be faster? I would have thought the render times would have been pretty similar really.
It used to be similar until I finally got a quad core machine.
-
Alas i'm stuck with a mere dual core. I'm sure a render farm would fix that, though

-
nice job on the SSS... shade looks great.... i dont think maxwell would be any faster, personally.... depending on the settings for the SSS material on the shade..
-
I didnt bother with sss for the shade, kept it single face thickness and used a diffuse transmitter. Just me being too lazy to model the shade with thickness, really.
-
haha....even better

-
@remus said:
Alas i'm stuck with a mere dual core. I'm sure a render farm would fix that, though

Its hard to compare resuslts, I'm just learning, and test driving V-ray for SU
It did this simple rendering in 7 min.

-
Just a mini update, heres the real thing for comparison.

-
Remus, Nice job. I like the warmth of the light. Make me want to take a nap....
-
Is that a missing petal? or is it a design feature?
-
i suppose you could call it a 'feature'
Its more my dodgy workmanship really. -
oh, looking back the first render I get it now. The petals are in pairs, so there are gaps on purpose. In this photo, only one gap is visible, sort of looked like a single missing petal.
Is it stained glass? Did you slump the glass yourself?
-
It's tissue paper that i sprayed with PVA
A lot easier to work with than glass. -
This lamp is full of surprises. Quite nice, well done.
Chris
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register LoginAdvertisement