• Login
sketchucation logo sketchucation
  • Login
🤑 SketchPlus 1.3 | 44 Tools for $15 until June 20th Buy Now

GE Optimization?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Google Earth
sketchup
7 Posts 4 Posters 1.7k Views 4 Watching
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    Gaieus
    last edited by 18 Jan 2009, 15:29

    For a GE model, it is highly recommended not to have extraneous geometry inside (so make it a "single box" without wall thickness and any inside faces) as well as not to have coplanar faces which cause Z-fighting and all like that.

    I've just run across the CADspan plugin for SU which is a free plugin for non-commercial use ❗ (but after all many who model for GE model non-commercially).

    In the firs step of the "model optimization" - as shown in this video - the plugin "clans" your model in a way GE "likes" it best, further more intersects all (later) visible faces and all - except for one thing; it will triangulate all faces (this is apparently needed for the stl file format for 3D printing for which the plugin originally was made) but of course, with some simple plugins like DeleteCoplanarEdges, you can get rid of those by just two clicks.

    Final "verdict": even if you make a complex model of something, with just a couple of clicks you can make a GE friendly version of it easily. I haven't tried it with textured faces so I don't know how it would behave in such an environment.

    Happy modeling 👍

    Gai...

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • D Offline
      db-3d
      last edited by 20 Jan 2009, 22:07

      I'll have to check out that plugin.

      What I find the best is to make sure no objects are smaller then 2". Google Earth does some funky things with smaller objects so the smallest I'll go is 3". Test that out to see the results.

      Also, always delete the bottom face, avoid creating your own terrain and us .png textures as often as possible. You'll save a lot of time modeling high levels of details if you just use a png instead. Attached is an example where you can see the difference.

      GE models are definitely a different style of modeling. Most users want to add as much detail as possible. Just let the textures do the talking. You'll spend more time in photoshop then in sketchup but you'll have a great result.

      Picture-2.gif

      -Dan

      -Daniel Brown: SketchUp & Google Earth Trainer
      http://db-3d.com: design|modeling|training|consulting

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        twharvey
        last edited by 21 Jan 2009, 07:09

        @db-3d said:

        Also, always delete the bottom face, avoid creating your own terrain and us .png textures as often as possible. You'll save a lot of time modeling high levels of details if you just use a png instead. Attached is an example where you can see the difference.

        Dan,

        I usually use .png files when I need a tranparent area, but otherwise I use .jpg. In the attached screen dump, the image on the left is .jpg and the right is .png. I can't see much difference in detail. Both images are 455 X 284 pixels, but the .jpg file is 91.4 KB while the .png file is 249 KB.

        Could you explain a bit more the advantages of .png over .jpg.

        Thanks,
        Tom


        .jpg - .png comparison

        Tom

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          remus
          last edited by 21 Jan 2009, 07:23

          .png is a lossless format, so you can resave your pic as many times as you want and you wont lose any detail. If you do the same with .jpg you can suffer a notable loss of quality, the pay off being the larger file sizes.

          A good workflow is to save as .png until youve finished editing your texture, at which point you can save it as a .jpg with no fear of degrading the image any more than is necessary.

          http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • G Offline
            Gaieus
            last edited by 21 Jan 2009, 08:58

            Also png images can carry transparency info which can be very useful with - say - a fence or a statue cutout and such.

            Gai...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T Offline
              twharvey
              last edited by 21 Jan 2009, 12:57

              Thanks Remus, Gaieus.

              ...learn somethin' new every day.

              Tom

              Tom

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D Offline
                db-3d
                last edited by 21 Jan 2009, 13:45

                I can't agree more with the comments above. Since .png are a lossless format, file sizes tend to be larger. Try to limit texture widths to 500 pixels. GE will crunch alot of this info anyway to make the filesize smaller.

                What I was trying to get across in my image is that you dont have to model between the steel beams:the cutout. This will save time and polygons. Also .png's are great for signage. check out the logo for the fedex forum.

                -Daniel Brown: SketchUp & Google Earth Trainer
                http://db-3d.com: design|modeling|training|consulting

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 1 / 1
                1 / 1
                • First post
                  7/7
                  Last post
                Buy SketchPlus
                Buy SUbD
                Buy WrapR
                Buy eBook
                Buy Modelur
                Buy Vertex Tools
                Buy SketchCuisine
                Buy FormFonts

                Advertisement