Spaceship (Collaborative Project)

Marian

It should definitely be the front.

I have a lot of favourite ships....can't really decide on one that we should use as referecence.
Lets just write up a description of how it should look.
So it should be a 200m Exploration cruiser with a solid, sleek and sexy shape. It should look advanced, not a cluncker. It's not a warship so it's not full of weapons, though it should definitely have a few for protection and for experiments and other reasons.

iichiversii

Hey this post has on average 100 views a day, I just relised that, ever get the feeling we are being watched,

So advanced and not a cluncker, streamlined explorer, you have my attention, sexy? Have you being reading "50 shades of Gray" lol, ok let's break it down, how many engines do we need? Is it just an orbital ship or can it land? Do we have a flight deck for shuttles etc...

Marian

@iichiversii said:

Hey this post has on average 100 views a day, I just relised that, ever get the feeling we are being watched,

I hope we'll eventually have something to show to the people watching us.

No, it's just orbital and might have a few shuttles...maybe attached to the hull?
We'll see if it needs more small modular engines or one big engine depending on the shape.

iichiversii

I suggest 2 shuttles , I was thinking it would be best to contain them inside I'll give an example of how they dispatch, I think you might like this idea.

Now I think we will get something built, I'm studying your style over to see how I can merge mine with yours, and I have a few ideas

iichiversii

Congrads on the thea licence, you lucky dog

Marian

Thank you and I have to thank the Holy Laws of Hazard.

Are you looking at my gallery on DA?http://marian87.deviantart.com/gallery/

stefanq

Yes guys, you are being watched. Now, I'm just jealous of you two, because you're having fun and TIME to do this. But. I can't imagine what your ship will look like. You guys definitely know your sh.t with all that terminology, but I for one, don't know the difference.
"not a cluncker, streamlined explorer" and so on, but I think you should put here some references, if not for you, at least for us, the watchers.Like I said to Marian, I've already spent an evening browsing concept ships blog.
So, what are you guys building?

iichiversii

@stefanq said:

Yes guys, you are being watched. Now, I'm just jealous of you two, because you're having fun and TIME to do this. But. I can't imagine what your ship will look like. You guys definitely know your sh.t with all that terminology, but I for one, don't know the difference.
"not a cluncker, streamlined explorer" and so on, but I think you should put here some references, if not for you, at least for us, the watchers.Like I said to Marian, I've already spent an evening browsing concept ships blog.
So, what are you guys building?

Sure Stefang, we will explain our terminology in future, apologies mate, and cheers for the heads up

iichiversii

I have being, im just after redoing that last model i did last nite to reduce the poly count, its as close as i could get it, have some fun with it, tear it apart. add to it, bin it if you dont like it,

Removed the model for editing, found a few flaws after posting, will submit again as a new post