Osama bin Laden's hideout in Abbottabad Pakistan
-
@honoluludesktop said:
History demonstrates that no responsible man remains untouched, and uncompromised.
True. We agree in this regard. Yet some politicans misuse the concept of 'the burden of responsibility' to force their own, all too exclusive agenda. (Anecdote: my girlfriend and myself were invited to dinner at a high-ranking NATO official's some time ago. As the evening progressed, the topic of conversation shifted to politics. At one point I asked the NATO official why he'd thought George W. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq - as I'd never been able to quite work that one out. After an uneasy silence, he said: "It was personal." I apologize for bringing up Bush again, I really do.)
@unknownuser said:
Osama bin laden would’ve lived out the rest of his days in Alabama or Kentucky somewhere receiving welfare and food stamps off the backs of the American people.
An astute analysis.
-
@honoluludesktop said:
srx, and others,
hummm, well, at least, i am others
cheers up ¡¡¡ 
@honoluludesktop said:
Without politics, there is no order amoung individuals.
It is Love not Politics which creates order among individuals.
My thought,
So to say. Sorry**Honoluludesktop**. -
did you see my last link ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLuw1N8RsyA
it was about profit
and**prophets** -
Didn't realize I might have to defend American from unsubstantiated personal opinions. It appears that you judge us poorly regarding defending ourselves against a enemy that has killed thousands of people in America, then hides in a someone else's country. Doesn't the English government work with America in defense of its own citizens from the terrorist attacks of Al Qaeda?
At least use the best source of information to form an opinion. While not accurate at all times, the White House briefings do attempt to correct erroneous statements.
-
I'd like to raise a slightly different point:
In 1980 there was a siege of the Iranian embassy in London after it had been taken over by Iranian Arab separatists. The siege was ended when the SAS controversially stormed the building in Operation Nimrod killing 5 of the 6 hostile occupants who were members of the DMRA (Democratic Revolutionary Movement for the Liberation of Arabistan), a group that was virtually unknown before they seized this building. The incident was filmed and broadcast live by the BBC and ITN. News teams were camped outside the embassy. A unit from the British news organisation ITN, using recently introduced Electronic News Gathering (ENG) camera equipment, managed to establish a viewpoint at the rear of the embassy. It was images from this vantage point that showed the SAS raid on the building live on television after their correspondent had been 'tipped off'. (However the SAS insisted on a short time-delay between the live events and their broadcast in case the militants were watching the broadcasts). The footage is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_p4DmuGyehc
source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Embassy_SiegeAnd this was in 1980's Britain where as a nation we generally did things discreetly and with very limited resources.
You are telling me that Barrack Obama and the US government with their record of showmanship, aren't releasing the film of the demise of the greatest criminal of our time because of some supposed higher principles?!
Or their consideration that they might make OBL an idol - He already is to his followers. -
@honoluludesktop said:
It appears that you judge us poorly regarding defending ourselves against a enemy that has killed thousands of people in America, then hides in a someone else's country.
Whoa, whoa - you got it backwards. One cannot 'defend' oneself against atrocities that have already happened. You can, obviously, bring the culprit to justice, but the way things are looking at the moment, that wasn't the prime objective. Revenge, and boosting Obama's popularity in all likelyhood were. Do I particulary care Bin Laden is dead? No. Do I feel the US have violated Pakistan's sovereignity, and Bin Laden's rights as a person? Yes and yes.
Question: if, say, France were convinced terrorists were hiding in Ohio, would you deem it okay for the French government to send drones into the American airspace? Or to extract people from the US without the US's government's formal consent?
-
And you think that 9/11 was the end of their attacks on America? The French example is just to tickle my ear right. Suggest real events like the French exploding a aerial nuclear weapon in my back yard. The English, and French air attacks in Libya. Stuff like that happens all the time.
-
@honoluludesktop said:
And you think that 9/11 was the end of their attacks on America?
I'm inclined to believe Bin Laden's death will make no difference with regards to future terrorist strikes against American targets. Or European ones, for that matter. Don't forget we're in the same boat as you guys are.
Of course, it'll prove interesting to see what the data collected at Osama's hideout will reveal. Had he really become a mere figurehead, or was he still leading al-Qaeda?
And again, I'm not exceptionally sorry the man is dead. I simply feel countries should respect eachother's sovereignity. Except, obviously, when not doing so would result in grave crimes being commited against humanity. Libya is nothing like the botched abduction/execution of Bin Laden.
I think.
@honoluludesktop said:
Suggest real events like the French exploding a aerial nuclear weapon in my back yard.
Hm, I'd forgotten about that. Chilling, criminal, and utterly abhorring.
-
Fair points.
-
My $.02 FWIW, and it's just opinion...
I'll start off by saying I'm against the US meddling in other nation's business in any way. I've been against the Iraq invasion before it even started, and Afghanistan was somewhat necessary but has gotten out of hand. I am ashamed of the Americans cheering and chanting "USA" in the streets. This is not the Olympics, we didn't get a gold medal. Cheering death is terrible.
That said, there is simply no other way the Bin Laden story could have ended. The only better ending would have been a bomb dropped on his hideout killing him - much less personal and execution-like. Some think OBL should be placed on trial and put in prison. I disagree. As long as the man was held alive he would have become a rallying point for anti-western sentiment. Does one assume that his followers won't threaten to and execute terrorist attacks to pressure us to set him free? How many suicide bombers on trains, subways or aircraft are worth keeping him alive? Is that risk worth it? Not pursuing him to the end leaves a continuing threat and instigator alive (though IMO he was increasingly irrelevant, but I'm no intelligence officer) and a rallying point for terrorists.
Do I think the the invasion of Pakistan to kill him was right? Yes. I'm 100% sure that knowledge of OBL living in Pakistan went very high up in the chain of command, and he received direct assistance from Pakistan. Not across the board, but enough to exist without too many worries from his host.
Was it an execution? Yes. Undoubtedly. He was never going to leave the building alive. Was it revenge? I cannot deny that it is possible; though at this point to me it is an impersonal, distasteful deed. Was it justice? No. Maybe if you're an "eye for an eye" type, but not to me. Too many have died and the water has become too muddy for justice to ever be extracted from this situation. Burial at sea? Fine. No need to create a new Mecca for his followers.
There is NO way there could have been a good ending to this story.
-
Jeff beat me to it. I'm pretty sure it was simply an execution...whatever the official line might be. And personally, I couldn't care less.
Of course, criminals ought to be put on trial whenever possible; but I don't think that would have been possible with Bin Laden, as his lunatic followers sought to effect his release by ever more desperate acts.
The acid test would have to be if you were granted the gift of foresight and saw your wife/children/family members slaughtered in yet another pointless terrorist act attempting to put pressure on the International Court...whether you would still be able to put your hand on your heart and say "Yes, that is a price worth paying. Justice must be seen to be done." I know I couldn't. The guy just wasn't worth it.
I agree, attempted terrorists strikes will continue...but they would have been more concentrated and focused in the context of a period of legal proceedings. Bin Laden's human rights are not worth the life of one more innocent bystander. -
@unknownuser said:
At one point I asked the NATO official why he'd thought George W. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq - as I'd never been able to quite work that one out. After an uneasy silence, he said: "It was personal." I apologize for bringing up Bush again, I really do.)
Gosh, I'm glad you got to the bottom of that mystery. The entire world has been waiting for an 100% credible for exactly why Bush did it. Now, we know it wasn't all that intelligence from the Brits, French, and US intelligence agencies that was the motivating factor. Your NATO general needs a promotion for that one. And, you deserve an emphatic attaboy for your part in finding the smoking gun.
-
@david. said:
Gosh, I'm glad you got to the bottom of that mystery.
You're most welcome. Now take that tone and shove it.
Edit: Err, bit brash. Sorry.
-
@unknownuser said:
It is Love not Politics which creates order among individuals.
My thought,
So to say. Sorry Honoluludesktop.
Truth!...Your Avatar suits you.
Honolulu,(... and others
) haven't you watched Matrix?
Politics is not what is shown in NEWS. -
and what do you**people** think about this ?
YouTube - Help put this TV Ad on the Air -- Go to RememberBuilding7.org
What if Bin Laden did not do it ?
Why has not it been investigated ?
-
Not sure what to do here...
Laugh or cry...I must be psychic, cause I did predict that this thread would evolve with all sorts of conspiracy theories...
Juan... It's hoax... These things have been investigated...
-
@juanv.soler said:
What if Bin Laden did not do it ?
Why has not it been investigated ?He's on video, admitting he did it. What's more, he said he was pleasantly surprised the the buildings collapsed. They'd only planned for destruction at the point of impact and the floors above.
It has been investigated; it's just that some people prefer fantasy to fact. It seems to make their lives more interesting.
Tens of thousands of people witnessed two fully fueled jets crash into the buildings...as did countless TV cameras. Not one person noticed mysterious figures carrying tons of semtex and miles of detcord.Just because there are some civil engineering aspects that remain unanswered (because humans are fallible) doesn't mean that Bin Laden was framed, the NSA is the real culprit ...or that we should all go around wearing tinfoil hats to stop 'Them' or little green men from alpha centauri from messing with our minds.
-
@alan fraser said:
...doesn't mean that Bin Laden was framed...
...or that we should all go around wearing tinfoil hats to stop 'Them' or little green men from alpha centauri from messing with our minds.
-
Frederik, Alan,
thankyou for telling your thoughts on this issue.
Anyone else likes to comment ?
cheers -
@alan fraser said:
Just because there are some civil engineering aspects that remain unanswered (because humans are fallible) doesn't mean that Bin Laden was framed, the NSA is the real culprit ...
I don't buy the conspiracy theories about the US government being behind the 9/11 attacks either. Bush is an evil twit in my opinion, but not this evil. As a president, the man was a school bully with near-infinite resources, not the second coming of Adolf H. Furthermore, 'they' (be it the NSA, or any other agency) could've never kept a ploy of this magnitude covered up.
And what could they've possibly gained?
Advertisement