sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Romanesque monastery

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Gallery
    23 Posts 4 Posters 6.4k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GaieusG Offline
      Gaieus
      last edited by

      I think, if you wish to "visualize" the building, you should rather go for an "idealised" solution rather than sticking strictly to the "facts". After all, you are (probably) not building it for a precise and accurate historic, physical reconstruction but to provide an overall impression how it would look like and believe me that those minuscule differences will never be seen.

      I know, from some point of view it's a "lie" but while for Medieval builders, it wasd practically all the same to build one arch a couple of centimetres bigger or smaller (as it "came" on the fly - not to speak about the fact that generations used to work on these buildings and after a century, they obviously build some things differently) for you, it would definitely be rather a nightmare to model every vault differently just because there are a couple of centimetres differences between them.

      I'd even say that a 40 cm distortion (over 84 metres) is most probably also not "deliberate" but just inaccuracy in building so you may also disregard it.

      I'm currently working on a Roman basilica where the inside pillars are placed a couple of centimetres misaligned to each other (and their sizes vary between like 88 and 92 cm). Should I care? Would this change anything in the overall structure? Definitely not and average 90 cm pillars aligned equally to each other will definitely do the job.

      There are two pairs of them however where the difference is much more significant and was obviously due to deliberate design so I will have to model those accordingly of course.


      Bazilika.jpg

      Gai...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • MALAISEM Offline
        MALAISE
        last edited by

        Very interesting topic Aerillius and Gaius. I learned some useful things about medieval buildings. About lights, candles were put on heavymetal supports which were hanged with chains.
        May I suggest also to " smooth " the light when rendering? The sun light going throw the windows in the "Limburg3.jpg" picture seems to be too bright regarding the limburg Church location. ( It's like Mediterranean sea sun's brightness )

        MALAISE 👍

        La Connaissance n'a de valeur que partagée

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          Aerilius
          last edited by

          Many thanks for the advice!
          There are still some artifacts where light is coming through the walls (gaps of zero width)
          When it's finished, I will need to exercise which the best render settings are.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            Aerilius
            last edited by

            Now most modeling is finished (yes, the westwerk is a more modern reconstruction than on the old painting). I'm making lots of textures. Here are some test renders without textures:
            I have still problems with photon mapping, there are some light phenomenons. I used global illumination and the maximum number of photons, but it is still there.
            westwerk
            main nave and intersection


            ![view from the entrance hall ("paradise") into the main nave, only normal raytracing](/uploads/imported_attachments/iEcc_render9b.jpg "view from the entrance hall ("paradise") into the main nave, only normal raytracing")

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GaieusG Offline
              Gaieus
              last edited by

              Great images - please, post more.

              About the light leaks... I don't know what may cause them but I really hope someone on the Kerky forums will be able to find the solution. Some really great renders could be made from this fine model - either textured or "just" in this clay mode.

              Can the problem be that it is actually not textured and your default colour is too light (almost or totally white)? That gives hard times to a lot of rendering apps.

              Gai...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • MALAISEM Offline
                MALAISE
                last edited by

                What a render Aerillius ! I'm fond of the nave and Intersection ones! Light rays amplify the "Collectedness" often found in old church or forests.

                More pictures please.

                MALAISE 👍

                La Connaissance n'a de valeur que partagée

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • GaieusG Offline
                  Gaieus
                  last edited by

                  BTW that "intersection" is called "crossing" in English (but of course this doesn't matter the slightest in this case).

                  Gai...

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    Macker
                    last edited by

                    The best way to resolve your lighting issues in the interior shots is to use Metropolis Light Transport rather than PM+FG. Though to achieve the "light rays" you'll need to turn on bi-directional path tracing.

                    For the exterior shots I'd use Path Tracing (Progressive), but I'd be sure to set the supersampling to at least 2x2, and definately 3x3 if render time isn't an issue.

                    Check out my blog @ http://macviz.blogspot.co.uk

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      Aerilius
                      last edited by

                      Texturing is now complete. For these renders, I have not yet used bump maps and procedurals.


                      render7.jpg


                      render4.jpg


                      render5.jpg

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • GaieusG Offline
                        Gaieus
                        last edited by

                        Looking nice so far (oh, no - great)

                        Bumps and some subtle reflections/shininess here and there will definitely put it onto a next level.

                        Try to create a bit of environment for it (some terrain, grass, roads/paths, trees) and it will rock!

                        Gai...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GaieusG Offline
                          Gaieus
                          last edited by

                          These are really cool models, Aerilius!
                          About naming strategy - why not organise them into appropriate folder? Like Romanesque > Windows/Doors/Columns etc...

                          (Especially now, with the back button back in the component browser, it's not too much effort to navigate between the folders)

                          Gai...

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            Aerilius
                            last edited by

                            I've still been working on it, but I think I can start rendering today (with now bump maps, shininess, layerd materials etc)

                            By the way, I just found a way to make it look more real, "real 3d" 😆
                            http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=179&t=22754&p=192152#p192152

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • GaieusG Offline
                              Gaieus
                              last edited by

                              Anyway, looking forward to seeing it. I had a look at the screenshots in your other topic and they indeed look promising! 👍

                              Gai...

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                Aerilius
                                last edited by

                                Kerkythea is busy. But in the meantime I can post an image from some days ago:
                                2009-10-14_Limburg_Schöpfwerk.jpg
                                now in ruins

                                The monastery had a well (quite deep - 84m through the rock). I found a reconstruction drawing from 1852 for the bucket elevator (there are also other proposals like a wooden crane). I used the "aged materials pack" (was very difficult to adjust for the size of this model).

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Offline
                                  Aerilius
                                  last edited by

                                  I added the surrounding buildings, the cloister, the refectory and the sacristy.
                                  Unfortunately all in gothic architecture and not romanesque, so it took longer than I wanted. For that the effort was worth it, I uploaded some components to 3d-warehouse.

                                  http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/download?mid=aae30d4b36f19d48a124f4737362fcd&rtyp=lt&ctyp=other&ts=1254695240000

                                  I hope they will be useful to someone.

                                  I have already 120 components, already very confusing. I should optimize my naming strategy.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • GaieusG Offline
                                    Gaieus
                                    last edited by

                                    Ehm... 😳

                                    Is that first image a reconstruction and render of the well? 😲

                                    Gai...

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Offline
                                      Aerilius
                                      last edited by

                                      I've tried some more renders, as spherical panoramas. I think they allow a much more realistic experience to the viewer than an animation (coming soon), because I don't have to care about render time and can use much better settings and light effects.
                                      See here: http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=81&t=23796

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A Offline
                                        Aerilius
                                        last edited by

                                        I posted some final renders in the gallery.

                                        In October, I have also rendered some thousand images, but I'm afraid I will not have enough time to finish the animation in the last days of vacations.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • 1
                                        • 2
                                        • 1 / 2
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        Buy SketchPlus
                                        Buy SUbD
                                        Buy WrapR
                                        Buy eBook
                                        Buy Modelur
                                        Buy Vertex Tools
                                        Buy SketchCuisine
                                        Buy FormFonts

                                        Advertisement