Windows 7
-
In yet more exciting news, i hear windows 7 can burn .iso images without the need for additional software.
-
theres a very good round up here: http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/windows-7-beta-in-depth-impressions/#comments for anyone whos still interested.
-
The Vista haters are wrong.
Since SP1, Vista became very stable and better than XP.I will go Windows 7, but probably when I need to buy a new PC.
That's the bad remark I have about Microsoft: migrating from an old to a new OS is a fuss. -
I'm just not finding that. I have Sp1 installed and vista still seems very clunky.
-
Don't go disagreeing with people again, Jon. You know it upsets them. Have you no empathy?
But on a more serious note: I liked XP better as well. Vista's not bad, but there's certain things that'll drive you mad.
-
I hope to be using XP for a couple of more years... Hopefully SU will be released for Linux by then
-
@kwistenbiebel said:
The Vista haters are wrong.
Since SP1, Vista became very stable and better than XP.I will go Windows 7, but probably when I need to buy a new PC.
That's the bad remark I have about Microsoft: migrating from an old to a new OS is a fuss.I concur, no Vista problem. Used it for a year. Both Vista 64 bit Ultimate and Vista 64 bit Home Premium. Had less crash than my G4 with Leopard. I don't understand where all the hostility is coming from.
-
I have the 32bit version, so maybe the 64bit version is much better.
-
64 bit and 32 bit are essentiallly the samre as far as im aware.
As for peoples annoyance at vista, i reckon a large part of it comes from UAC.
-
@remus said:
As for peoples annoyance at vista, i reckon a large part of it comes from UAC.
I think you could be right about that. What were they thinking?
Apart from being annoyed with UAC, I personally don't have anything against Vista.Oh ... MS should kill Windows Media Player. Anyone use that piece of junk?
-
I am using it right now.
-
Its was a slow Friday morning. Since Designers appear to have more time on their hands these days, I thought I would install Windows 7 beta on a new 500gb SATA Hdd
Here are my observations:
- No automatic router internet connection yet, unlike Ubuntu 8.10. The entire install still takes almost twice as long as Ubuntu.
- No optimized monitor display recognition from video card
- Very poor quality system font display. (muddy grey), much worse than the existing Vista or XP font display.
- No recognition of 2nd data filled 500gb SATA Hdd, even though the bios had recognized it prior to boot up. It did find a 3rd 250gb IDE Hdd however.
I'm interested in hearing about your experience, should you find some spare time.
-
http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/03/windows-7-skus-announced-yes-your-worst-nightmare-has-come-to/2
Who ever thought having 7 versions of the same thing was a good idea is a sandwich short of a picnic in my opinion.
-
Anyone know if Win7 work with the WinXP printers that Vista has no driver for? Actually the only reason I didn't do an upgrade.
-
if there isnt a vista driver i doubt there is a win7 driver. As far as i can tell win7 and vista are very similar architecturally.
-
Well, Sigh, Thanks. Unless I am willing to take a performance hit, and run Win7 in a VM hosted on WinXP, an upgrade is not in the making for a while.
-
-
Look at the date
(If only!) -
sigh perhaps one day...
-
@remus said:
64 bit and 32 bit are essentiallly the samre as far as im aware.
As for peoples annoyance at vista, i reckon a large part of it comes from UAC.
I had to buy Vista when I built my new PC and must say for the most part I was positivly surprised.
UAC is a whole other story.
See my problems in this thread: http://www.sketchucation.com/forums/scf/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=17248&start=15
Advertisement