Why vote Obama?
-
@bellwells said:
Touched a nerve, huh? Well why don't you tell me WTF your point was, because it's not obvious.
You kidding, Wells?
Setup:
"Did you know that Mohamed Atta, the 9/11 ring leader, had a valid Florida driver’s license? Did you know 13 of the 19 hijackers had obtained valid driver’s licenses? Armed with these licenses, eight of the hijackers even registered to vote!"
Punchline:
"Here is the shocking fact: Barack Hussein Obama strongly supports giving illegal aliens in America driver’s licenses."
-
Ergo, Obama sides with terrorists? Is this what upset you so?
-
Time is running out and desperation has set in, cut the guy a break ... the world is about to end according to his clan.
Talking of clan, I saw a peice today about them and other white supremacist movements that have recently got record new recruits in the wake of the presidency going to a black man. (this country is about to show it's ugly face which it's been hiding for so long).
-
@alan fraser said:
@unknownuser said:
Did you came to the defense of Christians on the other threads which denigrated Christianity?
No, because no one was suggesting that Christianity was tantamount to being a terrorist.....and before you start making out that I'm some kind of atheistic pinko, Ron, I might add that I was in Church last Sunday morning, as usual. Which is more than can be said for most ignorant right wingers that spread that kind of racist crap. Just get off your high horse and stop being so bloody confrontational.
I will be as confrontational as I see fit and necessary. EDIT: How, on earth, you came to the conclusion I was making you out to be some kind of atheistic pinko is beyond me. Am I to assume you think I'm an ignorant racist right winger? EDIT AGAIN: To clarify, my initial post was not meant to be confrontational, just inquisitive.
-
@bellwells said:
Ergo, Obama sides with terrorists? Is this what upset you so?
Bingo, Ron. I object to people providing links to this kind of demagogic crap here.
-
Gotcha. I agree completely.
-
post content deleted
-
I edited the post that has caused the blood pressure problem with some of you, now go back to arguing with each other, rather than about me. I don't want to offend anyone and be banned, oh my.
-
@unknownuser said:
Could you possibly fuck off regardless?
Ouch. Aren't we a little touchy? Don't like what you read and you go off the deep end, huh? Now that's not cricket.
-
Ron, seeing as Stinkie, has gone into 'bleep' mode
Is
there any chance you could edit your to 'bleep' also
I feel like an old fart doing this job sometimes, but keep me
happy, pleaseOn second thoughts, sort it out yourselves, I'm getting confused
now -
May I suggest F@K* instead?
-
Bellwells wrote:
@unknownuser said:
Or Pete's lie about Palin's report card?
Stop being such a righteous F*@K, it does not become you ... see your very partisan postings (while denying being partisan) you come off as a poster-boy for the extreme right republicans, at least I admit my bias.
-
@bellwells said:
...I, got pissed at Tom for posting the video which flat out lied about McCain at the Senate hearing?...
Ron, I apologized for making that post once I realized it was a fake (though you never apologized for calling me a liar...among so many other inaccurate/insulting characterizations). Continuing to bring it up says volumes about the kind of person you are and about your real intentions in these discussions. I am quite disappointed I ever gave your comments the credence worthy my replies.
EDIT: (Maybe you could post a new pic of yourself to stave off future confusion...you know, one taken after you shaved your head :`)
-
-
-
Touchy? No, Ron. I merely consider it a moral duty to tell anyone who spreads crypto fascist propaganda to go F@K* themselves. Without asterisks, too.
Got that?
-
@unknownuser said:
Touchy? No, Ron. I merely consider it a moral duty to tell anyone who spreads crypto fascist propaganda to go "bleep" themselves. Without asterisks, too.
Got that?
Like when I, and ONLY I, got pissed at Tom for posting the video which flat out lied about McCain at the Senate hearing? Or Pete's lie about Palin's report card?
EDIT: If we're both on course for seeking truth, that's fine.
-
@tomsdesk said:
@bellwells said:
...I, got pissed at Tom for posting the video which flat out lied about McCain at the Senate hearing?...
Ron, I apologized for making that post once I realized it was a fake (though you never apologized for calling me a liar...among so many other inaccurate/insulting characterizations). Continuing to bring it up says volumes about the kind of person you are and about your real intentions in these discussions. I am quite disappointed I ever gave your comments the credence worthy my replies.
EDIT: (Maybe you could post a new pic of yourself to stave off future confusion...you know, one taken after you shaved your head :`)
Why the hell would I apologize to you for being a liar? I gave you credit for apologizing about that post. The fact remains you were eager to post that crap and if I hadn't pointed the lie out, you would not have apologized. Now THAT speaks volumes. I could care less about receiving any credence from you. In fact, I specifically don't want it.
-
@solo said:
Bellwells wrote:
@unknownuser said:
Or Pete's lie about Palin's report card?
Stop being such a righteous F*@K, it does not become you ... see your very partisan postings (while denying being partisan) you come off as a poster-boy for the extreme right republicans, at least I admit my bias.
Now on to you. I have NEVER posted a lie like your report card, nor have I ever hidden my conservative bent. You two are starting to come off as arrogant liberals. Tom more so.
-
When I first posted it I never realised it was a fake, and when you directed me to a site that showed it to be a fake I decided to leave it up as removing it would have left a void in the discussion. I know you removed your racist image, but not by choice, I left mine by choice.
Advertisement