sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    Which image do you like best?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Gallery
    14 Posts 8 Posters 996 Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T Offline
      tomsdesk
      last edited by

      Mateo, you're a hoot!

      http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
      2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GaieusG Offline
        Gaieus
        last edited by

        @mateo soletic said:

        I picked the right one. πŸ‘

        Mee too! πŸ˜‰

        Gai...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • R Offline
          Ross Macintosh
          last edited by

          For what it's worth (perhaps nothing) I like the monochromatic one 32.4 times more than the brightly coloured ones. In general I'm not a fan of the almost fluorescent colours.

          Great looking model -- and I really-really like that sepiatone look for it.

          Regards, Ross

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T Offline
            tomsdesk
            last edited by

            Ross, worth a lot...thanks! These better? Far enough? Anyone else agree? Disagree? (Now this is what I'm talking about! :`)


            tn_!rock18-A8.jpg


            tn_!rock17-A3.jpg

            http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
            2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • T Offline
              tomsdesk
              last edited by

              Or these? (Thanks in advance.)


              tn_!rock18-A8lt.jpg


              tn_!rock17-A3lt.jpg

              http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
              2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                Ross Macintosh
                last edited by

                Much more pleasing to my eyes! I think I like the first set more because the skys seem a little more saturated. Both sets are pleasing.

                Just a little suggestion --- when you save images of such watercolours be sure to leave a margin of white space beyond. More than you've done. It's just like matting paintings -- it makes it easier for the viewers eyes to virtually dive right in by giving the paintings a buffer from the other colours/distractions.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R Offline
                  Ross Macintosh
                  last edited by

                  Tom - I hope you don't mind that I had some fun doing some postprocessing on your image and have posted it here. I've tried to move it into an monochromatic inkwash look. Some of the things I played with were lightening the sky so the image merges with the whitespace of the 'paper', darkening the foreground to give more emphasis to the foreground-to-background depth. I did the processing in Xara Xtreme Pro - vector illustration software that is pretty friendly to bitmaps.

                  Regards, Ross


                  toms-processed-inkwash.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    mateo soletic
                    last edited by

                    I agree, the first bunch definately. But the BW is also great.

                    [Concept Illustrations](http://concept-illustrations.com/)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • B Offline
                      bellwells
                      last edited by

                      @tomsdesk said:

                      Ross, worth a lot...thanks! These better? Far enough? Anyone else agree? Disagree? (Now this is what I'm talking about! :`)

                      I like this batch the most. The tree shadows are a little distracting to my eye. But then again, I'm due for another eye exam.

                      Ron

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R Offline
                        ridix
                        last edited by

                        As my art guru would say you need to have good bone structure in a picture. Good structure makes image easy to understand. Your house is not clearly set apart from landscape. Use light and dark to set it apart. Here is my quick light and dark study of your image:

                        http://www.designonme.com/sketchu/rendmod.jpg

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          SchreiberBike
                          last edited by

                          It is very impressive work, but I always come back to the question: What's the purpose for the graphic. (Insert almost anything to replace graphic.)

                          Artistically, I like the sepia tones and the softer images, but if it were a concept for a house I might have built, I'd need to be able to see the lines more clearly and to see how the lines of the house fit into the lines of the landscape. Natural colors will change and the architectural colors can be chosen further down the road.

                          I also doubt I'll ever park a pink car in my drive. πŸ˜† But like my comments above, that's just my personal preference.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          Buy SketchPlus
                          Buy SUbD
                          Buy WrapR
                          Buy eBook
                          Buy Modelur
                          Buy Vertex Tools
                          Buy SketchCuisine
                          Buy FormFonts

                          Advertisement