sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    πŸ€‘ SketchPlus 1.3 | 44 Tools for $15 until June 20th Buy Now

    Which image do you like best?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Gallery
    14 Posts 8 Posters 996 Views 8 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T Offline
      tomsdesk
      last edited by

      Please help me with some insight on your preferences...and of course I'd love to hear any comments on how to make them better, but especially the reasons why you don't like any of them. (I can take it :`)


      tn_!rock18-A6.jpg


      tn_!rock18-A6lt.jpg


      tn_!BWrock18-A6.jpg

      http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
      2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R Offline
        remus
        last edited by

        Personally i think the second image looks too washed out.

        http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          mateo soletic
          last edited by

          I picked the right one. πŸ‘

          [Concept Illustrations](http://concept-illustrations.com/)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T Offline
            tomsdesk
            last edited by

            Mateo, you're a hoot!

            http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
            2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GaieusG Offline
              Gaieus
              last edited by

              @mateo soletic said:

              I picked the right one. πŸ‘

              Mee too! πŸ˜‰

              Gai...

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                Ross Macintosh
                last edited by

                For what it's worth (perhaps nothing) I like the monochromatic one 32.4 times more than the brightly coloured ones. In general I'm not a fan of the almost fluorescent colours.

                Great looking model -- and I really-really like that sepiatone look for it.

                Regards, Ross

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • T Offline
                  tomsdesk
                  last edited by

                  Ross, worth a lot...thanks! These better? Far enough? Anyone else agree? Disagree? (Now this is what I'm talking about! :`)


                  tn_!rock18-A8.jpg


                  tn_!rock17-A3.jpg

                  http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
                  2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    tomsdesk
                    last edited by

                    Or these? (Thanks in advance.)


                    tn_!rock18-A8lt.jpg


                    tn_!rock17-A3lt.jpg

                    http://www.tomsdesk.moonfruit.com/
                    2.5D Trees & Shrubs!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R Offline
                      Ross Macintosh
                      last edited by

                      Much more pleasing to my eyes! I think I like the first set more because the skys seem a little more saturated. Both sets are pleasing.

                      Just a little suggestion --- when you save images of such watercolours be sure to leave a margin of white space beyond. More than you've done. It's just like matting paintings -- it makes it easier for the viewers eyes to virtually dive right in by giving the paintings a buffer from the other colours/distractions.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R Offline
                        Ross Macintosh
                        last edited by

                        Tom - I hope you don't mind that I had some fun doing some postprocessing on your image and have posted it here. I've tried to move it into an monochromatic inkwash look. Some of the things I played with were lightening the sky so the image merges with the whitespace of the 'paper', darkening the foreground to give more emphasis to the foreground-to-background depth. I did the processing in Xara Xtreme Pro - vector illustration software that is pretty friendly to bitmaps.

                        Regards, Ross


                        toms-processed-inkwash.jpg

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          mateo soletic
                          last edited by

                          I agree, the first bunch definately. But the BW is also great.

                          [Concept Illustrations](http://concept-illustrations.com/)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • B Offline
                            bellwells
                            last edited by

                            @tomsdesk said:

                            Ross, worth a lot...thanks! These better? Far enough? Anyone else agree? Disagree? (Now this is what I'm talking about! :`)

                            I like this batch the most. The tree shadows are a little distracting to my eye. But then again, I'm due for another eye exam.

                            Ron

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R Offline
                              ridix
                              last edited by

                              As my art guru would say you need to have good bone structure in a picture. Good structure makes image easy to understand. Your house is not clearly set apart from landscape. Use light and dark to set it apart. Here is my quick light and dark study of your image:

                              http://www.designonme.com/sketchu/rendmod.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S Offline
                                SchreiberBike
                                last edited by

                                It is very impressive work, but I always come back to the question: What's the purpose for the graphic. (Insert almost anything to replace graphic.)

                                Artistically, I like the sepia tones and the softer images, but if it were a concept for a house I might have built, I'd need to be able to see the lines more clearly and to see how the lines of the house fit into the lines of the landscape. Natural colors will change and the architectural colors can be chosen further down the road.

                                I also doubt I'll ever park a pink car in my drive. πŸ˜† But like my comments above, that's just my personal preference.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                Buy SketchPlus
                                Buy SUbD
                                Buy WrapR
                                Buy eBook
                                Buy Modelur
                                Buy Vertex Tools
                                Buy SketchCuisine
                                Buy FormFonts

                                Advertisement