sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • 登入
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    🔌 Smart Spline | Fluid way to handle splines for furniture design and complex structures. Download

    Ideas in CAD

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 Corner Bar
    31 貼文 15 Posters 1.7k 瀏覽 15 Watching
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • R 離線
      remus
      最後由 編輯

      Quite a simple question really, but do you think CAD (and computers in general) will ever recha the point where they overtake the pencil and paper as the primary means for visualising ideas?

      http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
      • FrederikF 離線
        Frederik
        最後由 編輯

        No...

        Cheers
        Kim Frederik

        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
        • R 離線
          remus
          最後由 編輯

          Whyd you say that frederik?

          perosnally i reckon tablet PCs are going to get there pretty soon...

          http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
          • P 離線
            pav_3j
            最後由 編輯

            i hope not, i just got shares in papermate. he he

            nothing is more fluid, and as rapid as a sketch. if anything i'd say that sometimes CAD restricts visualisation. there are no boundries with pen and paper.

            good question though.

            pav

            Just won the 'Who is Least Competitive Championships' where trying to win will make you lose. Trying to lose makes you win which makes you lose. Not trying at all makes you lose which makes you win which makes you lose.

            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
            • R 離線
              remus
              最後由 編輯

              What sort of boundaries are you refering to?

              i reckon with a nifty bit of programing and a wicked interface you could have a piece of software that imitates sketching on a CAD level.

              http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
              • StinkieS 離線
                Stinkie
                最後由 編輯

                That's quite possible, but the fact remains that using a pencil (or a byro, ...) can be great fun. At least, I think so.

                We mustn't forget either that a tablet doesn't fit in your back pocket. Or behind your ear.

                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                • R 離線
                  remus
                  最後由 編輯

                  Very good points, especially concerning portability. There isnt exactly a napkin equivalent in the computing world.

                  http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                  • P 離線
                    pav_3j
                    最後由 編輯

                    well (maybe this is a personal thing) i find that i can design better on paper than on a piece of software. i use the software to display my ideas more accurately afterwards, but initial ideas are always always always sketched (or a quick sketch model).
                    i find that if i use software to design, then i sometimes slip into designing what i know i can achieve with that piece of software, and not designing what is in my imagination.
                    there is no medium i can think of which is as free as pen an paper. the only boundaries are your imagination and obv. the size of the paper!

                    also when i'm talking to a client (during any stage of the design process) it's always infinitely easier to do a quick sketch for them to convery my ideas than to get the computer fired up. i find that they relate to it better as well.

                    like i said though, this is just my opinion.

                    i'd like to hear what others have to say on the matter, maybe i am totally wrong. (i don't think i am though! he he)

                    pav

                    Just won the 'Who is Least Competitive Championships' where trying to win will make you lose. Trying to lose makes you win which makes you lose. Not trying at all makes you lose which makes you win which makes you lose.

                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                    • D 離線
                      dylan
                      最後由 編輯

                      This is an interesting article if you hav not already read it.
                      http://www.aecbytes.com/tipsandtricks/2008/issue30-sketchbook.html

                      I tried the Sketchbook software and used my Wacom, but I just cannot get a drawing done as neatly as with pen and paper. Maybe this is down to practice and lack of experience with a tablet, but for me it feels pretty awkward. I guess if I kept at it, then I would improve, but I did think to myself, do I really need this? Why not just stick with sketching on paper?
                      The main thing interesting me was the fact I would have instant electronically stored files.

                      http://dmdarchitecture.co.uk/

                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                      • P 離線
                        pav_3j
                        最後由 編輯

                        the best of both worlds?

                        pav

                        Just won the 'Who is Least Competitive Championships' where trying to win will make you lose. Trying to lose makes you win which makes you lose. Not trying at all makes you lose which makes you win which makes you lose.

                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                        • chrisglasierC 離線
                          chrisglasier
                          最後由 編輯

                          I think this anecdote adds another perspective ...

                          An architect had a friend who was a whiz at producing photo realistic models of interiors. After a quick lunch with a client to receive the brief for a chic new restaurant, the architect visited the premises and within two days they had come up with what seemed like photographs of the finished interior. The architect next met the client and proudly presented the images. The client's face dropped. "I thought you would bring along some rough sketches, so that we could go through the ideas together."

                          With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                          • R 離線
                            remus
                            最後由 編輯

                            Chris, surely that problem would be easily solved by talking to the client 😉

                            pav and dylan, im still pondering on your posts...

                            http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                            • P 離線
                              pav_3j
                              最後由 編輯

                              lets face it remus, pen an paper is here to stay.
                              and i find it hard to believe that you don't think the same way 😉 he he

                              pav

                              Just won the 'Who is Least Competitive Championships' where trying to win will make you lose. Trying to lose makes you win which makes you lose. Not trying at all makes you lose which makes you win which makes you lose.

                              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                              • R 離線
                                remus
                                最後由 編輯

                                Of course its here to stay, theres no arguing that. Whta im trying to work out/discuss is wether UIs and software will ever reach the point where they are a viable alternative. (thats actualyl pretty different from what i wrote in the OP, but it raises pretty similar issues.)

                                http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                • chrisglasierC 離線
                                  chrisglasier
                                  最後由 編輯

                                  @remus said:

                                  Chris, surely that problem would be easily solved by talking to the client 😉

                                  This took place at least ten years ago in Hong Kong, at a time and in a place where the newest technology and speed would surely caress the client. It failed. From this it seems understanding what others expect can be as significant as the tools that suit the way you work.

                                  ... and so on

                                  Chris

                                  With TBA interfaces we can analyse what is to be achieved so that IT can help with automation to achieve it.

                                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                  • P 離線
                                    pav_3j
                                    最後由 編輯

                                    @remus said:

                                    Of course its here to stay, theres no arguing that. Whta im trying to work out/discuss is wether UIs and software will ever reach the point where they are a viable alternative. (thats actualyl pretty different from what i wrote in the OP, but it raises pretty similar issues.)

                                    hmm,

                                    laptop computer: £1000
                                    mouse: £10
                                    skecthup pro: $495

                                    drawing on the back of an old letter using a pencil you found on a colleagues desk: priceless.

                                    there are some techniques in design you can buy, for everything else there's sketching.

                                    he he

                                    pav

                                    Just won the 'Who is Least Competitive Championships' where trying to win will make you lose. Trying to lose makes you win which makes you lose. Not trying at all makes you lose which makes you win which makes you lose.

                                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                    • R 離線
                                      remus
                                      最後由 編輯

                                      CHris, none the less it is the designers fault more than anything else, he chose the wrong method of presentation for the client, that doesnt mean that there is something at fault with the technology. In the same way as if you tried to present a quick sketch for the final realisation of a project.

                                      Pav, do you have a computer? id say its a fairly standard peice of equipment these days. Not so much with swanky interfaces (tablets, tablet PCs etc.) but give it 10 years or so, im sure there will be some new interface device we could have never lived without.

                                      http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                      • P 離線
                                        pav_3j
                                        最後由 編輯

                                        @remus said:

                                        Pav, do you have a computer? id say its a fairly standard peice of equipment these days. Not so much with swanky interfaces (tablets, tablet PCs etc.) but give it 10 years or so, im sure there will be some new interface device we could have never lived without.

                                        i agree with you on computers being a standard piece of equipment, but like you say the "swanky interfaces" not so much (at this current moment in time). let's not forget though that these swanky interfaces, pretty much still rely on sketching techniques, graphics tablets, tablet PCs, are still fundamentally based on the good old pen and paper.

                                        who knows, maybe there will be some kind of "computer paper" (there probably already is) but this is still essentially a development on sketching.

                                        prehistoric man had cave walls and natural pigments, the egyptians had papyrus and ink, modern man a sketchbook and a pencil.
                                        i'm not saying that we wont be drawing on tablet pc's in the furure, i'm almost certain we will be, but the question was about whether we would be designing in CAD, and as far as i am concerned this is just an evolution in sketching, not a change in the way ideas are put down.

                                        pav

                                        Just won the 'Who is Least Competitive Championships' where trying to win will make you lose. Trying to lose makes you win which makes you lose. Not trying at all makes you lose which makes you win which makes you lose.

                                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                        • B 離線
                                          bubbalove
                                          最後由 編輯

                                          In the architecture firm I work at we always do sketches first. We've NEVER started a design on CAD! It seems absolutely pointless to try to design anything on CAD when it takes much longer to do then when using pen and paper. Once we get the go ahead on the design from the sketches... we then start to build models and technical documents! Sketchup can be fast but it is still not as fast as pen and paper!

                                          "Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." - Churchill

                                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                          • R 離線
                                            remus
                                            最後由 編輯

                                            DO you think its ever going to reach the point where it is possible ot do ideas in CAD?

                                            Pav, more pondering to do...

                                            http://remusrendering.wordpress.com/

                                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • 第一個貼文
                                              最後的貼文
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement