New Residential
-
Tina, thanks....really nice model, but "tweak" is more than a bit of an understatement: great work!
-
¡¡¡ WOW !!!
When I grow up, I want to do things like that... ¡hahahaha!
Great work, in deed! I like it!
Regards:
Antonio
-
..... I'll add my voice the the Tina Fan Club. I really like
the first imaage and thanks for explaining the process.Mike
PS: This is really excellent work for a woman
(before anyone
says anything, this is an ongoing joke between Tina and I) -
Spot on images
-
Just when I think I've got my act together, you go and post this Tina!!
Beautiful work. It's not about the software - this is artistry, pure and simple.
Inspiring. Thankyou!!
Andyc
-
really nice ....WWWWWWWWWooooooooooWWWWWW you are a great Digital Watercolorist... thanx 4 sharing
-
WOW! This is sooo nice. This is excellent work Tina. Your style is so effective.
-
Thanks everyone, I really appreciate your comments
-
Fantastic work. My only comment would be I am not so sure of the trees at the door. I think they (due to size) take away from the entry. Other than that this is some of the best watercolor I have seen in quite some time.
Scott
-
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!
allanx
-
Tina, these are really amazing. They have such a wonderful quality.
If you are looking for critique, in search of perfection, it is possible to push one's self and try and find something.
I have to agree with Mike's comment about the surrounding trees. They are too bright a colour and contrasty and steel from the focus of the building.I also agree about tree in front of the doorway. It does obscure. Being semi-transparent really doesn't change that and I have a personal problem with semi-transparent trees anyway. I know it is done in architecture, but I really don't think it is necessary and frankly, its a weird convention. If the tree is really going to obscure something important, use a skimpier tree. Otherwise, if it is just more brick, we get the idea and there is no reason to go transparent.
In this one the tree actually obscures the doorway and 90 percent of the time the focuse of these renderings should be the doorway. Inviting one in so to speak. Therefore the greatest area of contrast should always be arranged to be at the door. This door is a little too dark and obscured. In fact the window to the left is more contrasty.
But that was just pushing an academic critique. The overall execution is masterful, the moode delightful the technque wonderful.
-
brilliant! love the color, love the detail.
ps - susan, great critique. I learned a lot from that.
-
Nice and warm job Tina!
-
Tina!
Absolutely wonderful work - I so enjoy your style.
I think Susan's critique is right on, and I benefitted from looking at you images again to see what she was describing. I hope it was received well because it was very helpfull.Bytor
-
@mike lucey said:
PS: This is really excellent work for a woman
Mike, good thing you live so far away
kisses -
@sorgesu said:
I have to agree with Mike's comment about the surrounding trees. They are too bright a colour and contrasty and steel from the focus of the building.
Yes, I agree... I should have made those darker. Thanks for reminding me of that, both of you
@sorgesu said:
I also agree about tree in front of the doorway. It does obscure. Being semi-transparent really doesn't change that and I have a personal problem with semi-transparent trees anyway. I know it is done in architecture, but I really don't think it is necessary and frankly, its a weird convention. If the tree is really going to obscure something important, use a skimpier tree. Otherwise, if it is just more brick, we get the idea and there is no reason to go transparent.
In this one the tree actually obscures the doorway and 90 percent of the time the focuse of these renderings should be the doorway. Inviting one in so to speak. Therefore the greatest area of contrast should always be arranged to be at the door. This door is a little too dark and obscured. In fact the window to the left is more contrasty.
I totally agree, in this case it was specified by the client that these trees were there and the he would not agree to a change in angle, so..... darn clients
@sorgesu said:
But that was just pushing an academic critique. The overall execution is masterful, the moode delightful the technque wonderful.
Thank you Susan, you know how much I appreciate your input. It is always so valuable!
And thank you to everyone else as well!!
Advertisement