Transformations
-
Jim, what is the problem with the brick? The axis look ok to me. Is it that the brick isn't upright?
-
@cphillips said:
Jim, what is the problem with the brick? The axis look ok to me. Is it that the brick isn't upright?
Yes that is all. One option would be to flip the SKetchUp axes to match the LDraw axes before inporting. But I just want the bricks to be imported using the SU axes instead of the LDraw axes - including the sub-components.
I thought it would simply be a matter of performing an axes transformation on import - but so far the solution has been evasive.
-
Looks like LDraw uses Y is up instead of Z. You could just swap the Y and Z elements when you build the points for the faces. And also swap Y and Z in the translate part of the transform. That will change the axis.
-
I tried out what I suggested and it totally didnt work. I think it is because of the way scaling is being used. Flip Y and Z and you also need to flip ScaleY and ScaleZ. That is surely possible, but I dont know how to do it.
-
Have you tried the Transformation.axes method? It sounds like you should be able to "remap" the standard axes using this transform. Something like Transformation.axes(ORIGIN, X_AXES, Z_AXES, Y_AXES). Just a thought, I have no idea if it will work.
-
That is what I tried to use, but got some crazy results. My initial reaction is to assume I am not understanding how to use them. But if Chris had a problem, I might be inclined to think it's not just me.
-
@martinrinehart said:
If one of you who has figured on transformations could write a little article for those of us who haven't, it would be a GOOD THING!
What do you mean exactly Martin?
- How do Transformations work on a mathematical level and all the boring details that go along with it?
- How do i use the Geom::Transformtion class to trans, rotate, and scale stuff in SU?
A huge part of understanding Transformations in a mathematical sense is getting past the cryptic syntax. The good thing about a Transformation class is that you don't need to know crap about advanced math and even some basic college math principals to use the Transformation class quite easily.
Thats one thing i love about programming, code up a class that abstracts away all the details and forget about it! I'll leave the asinine number crunching to my processor!
-
@jessejames said:
What do you mean exactly Martin?
- How do Transformations work on a mathematical level and all the boring details that go along with it?
- How do i use the Geom::Transformtion class to trans, rotate, and scale stuff in SU?
2
I love those very smart people who can do #1, so the rest of us don't have to.
-
The transformation.axes method just transforms the object so that it's axes match the internal ones.
try using transformation.axes on the grouponent (I believe you used that one
)then use
grouponent.entities.transform_entities(grouponent.transformation.inverse,grouponent.entities.to_a)EDIT: Just tried it and it should work.
-
I just looked at the picture you posted again. Do you want flip the axes, instead of rotating them? If so, I don't know if that is possible. It's has to do with the fact that sketchup uses a right hand orientation, instead of left-hand orientation that I'm guessing LDraw uses (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-hand_rule).
Is there a way to change the orientation of axes in LDraw? (I haven't used it myself, so I have no idea)
-
One of the reasons I asked was that I wrote this LDraw importer. But the LDraw axes system does not match SketchUps, and I really want the importer to correct this on import. You can see the import works, but I haven't been able to figure out how to trasnform the geometry during the import so it uses a SketchUp axes that people are familiar with using.
Advertisement