Simply awesome "extensions" index

[xrok1]

just curious why you would list older versions off ruby's along with the new ones? i think it just causes clutter, its not likely someone is going to say hey it says ver.1.3 but i think i'll try ver.1 first in case its better.

and since ver.1 is sometimes not called ver.1, only the plug name :
bounce.rb
bounce.rb 1.2
it can cause confusion and make you think maybe there different rubys?

[Jim]

@xrok1 said:

:oops: oops, ijust clicked the link. sorry, i guess you're way ahead of me.

No, I don't like it either - I think a more clear link is appropriate instead of clicking the plugin name. I have fields for separate download and discussion URLs that just need put on the page. I am thinking a navbar would work well:

[ download | discussion | support | license | etc ]

@xrok1 said:

when i found it i noticed that the description wasn't really a description, but more of, well here take a look

That is the text written by the author of the plugin. It would have taken me forever to write suitable descriptions for every plugin out there. I cut and pasted most of them, and automated the rest.

@xrok1 said:

just curious why you would list older versions off ruby's along with the new ones?

Because the versions are still available for download.

[Ecuadorian]

Rubymon - Gotta catch 'em all!
But so far, it seems every ruby known to man is already indexed.

[Ecuadorian]

That would be too much work for the mods. Perhaps if those gifs you want could be user-submitted, it'll work.

[Ecuadorian]

And my ie, too, and my Google Chrome, and my Firefox... But I'm sure they'll sort it out.

EDIT: It was my own stupidity... I should have been clicking on the "Forums" button instead of scrolling down to see the forums... I figured it out some days ago.